Abstract
One of the main challenges in the study of social networks in vertebrates is to close the gap between group patterns and dynamics. Usually scan samples or transect data are recorded to provide information about social patterns of animals, but these techniques themselves do not shed much light on the underlying dynamics of such groups. Here we show an approach which captures the fission-fusion dynamics of a fish population in the wild and demonstrates how the gap between pattern and dynamics may be closed. Our analysis revealed that guppies have complex association patterns that are characterised by close strong connections between individuals of similar behavioural type. Intriguingly, the preference for particular social partners is not expressed in the length of associations but in their frequency. Finally, we show that the observed association preferences could have important consequences for transmission processes in animal social networks, thus moving the emphasis of network research from descriptive mechanistic studies to functional and predictive ones.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Blonder B, Wey TW, Dornhaus A, James R, Sih A (2012) Temporal dynamics and network analysis. Methods Ecol Evol 3:958–972
Boccaletti S, Latora V, Moreno Y, Chavez M, Hwang DU (2006) Complex networks: structure and dynamics. Phys Rep 424:175–308
Cane V (1978) On fitting low-order Markov chains to behaviour sequences. Anim Behav 26:332–338
Croft DP, Arrowsmith BJ, Bielby J, Skinner K, White E, Couzin ID, Magurran AE, Ramnarine I, Krause J (2003) Mechanisms underlying shoal composition in the Trinidadian guppy, Poecilia reticulata. Oikos 100:429–438
Croft DP, Krause J, James R (2004) Social networks in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Proc R Soc Lond B 271:S516–S519
Croft DP, James R, Thomas POR, Hathaway C, Mawdsley D, Laland KN, Krause J (2006) Social structure and co-operative interactions in a wild population of guppies (Poecilia reticulata). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 59:644–650
Croft DP, James R, Krause J (2008) Exploring animal social networks. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Croft DP, Krause J, Darden SK, Ramnarine IW, Faria JJ, James R (2009) Behavioural trait assortment in a social network: patterns and implications. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 63:1495–1503
Croft DP, Edenbrow M, Darden SK, Ramnarine IW, Oosterhout C, Cable J (2011a) Effect of gyrodactylid ectoparasites on host behaviour and social network structure in guppies Poecilia reticulata. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 65:2219–2227
Croft DP, Madden JR, Franks DW, James R (2011b) Hypothesis testing in animal social networks. Trends Ecol Evol 26:502–507
Cross PC, Creech TG, Ebinger MR, Heisey DM, Irvine KM, Creel S (2012) Wildlife contact analysis: emerging methods, questions, and challenges. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 66:1437–1447
Eagle N, Pentland A, Lazer D (2009) Inferring friendship network structure by using mobile phone data. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106:15274–15278
Flack JC, Girvan M, de Waal FBM, Krakauer DC (2006) Policing stabilizes construction of social niches in primates. Nature 439:426–429
Franks DW, James R, Noble J, Ruxton GD (2009) A foundation for developing a methodology for social network sampling. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 63:1079–1088
Godfrey SS, Bull C, James R, Murray K (2009) Network structure and parasite transmission in a group living lizard, the gidgee skink, Egernia stokesii. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 63:1045–1056
Guttridge TL, Gruber SH, DiBattista JD, Feldheim KA, Croft DP, Krause S, Krause J (2011) Assortative interactions and leadership in a free-ranging population of juvenile lemon shark Negaprion brevirostris. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 423:235–245
Harcourt JL, Sweetman G, Manica A, Johstone RA (2010) Pairs of fish resolve conflicts over coordinated movement by taking turns. Curr Biol 20:156–160
Henzi SP, Lusseau D, Weingrill T, Schaik CP, Barrett L (2009a) Cyclicity in the structure of female baboon social networks. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 63:1015–1021
Henzi SP, Lusseau D, Weingrill T, van Schaik CP, Barrett L (2009b) Cyclicity in the structure of female baboon social networks. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 63:1015–1021
Herbert-Read JE, Krause S, Morrell LJ, Schaerf TM, Krause J, Ward AJW (2013) The role of individuality in collective group movement. Proc R Soc B 280:2012–2564
Kerth GG, Perony NN, Schweitzer FF (2011) Bats are able to maintain long-term social relationships despite the high fission-fusion dynamics of their groups. Proc R Soc Lond B 278:2761–2767
Krause J, Ruxton GD (2002) Living in groups. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Krause J, Croft DP, James R (2007) Social network theory in the behavioural sciences: potential applications. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 62:15–27
Krause J, Lusseau D, James R (2009) Animal social networks: an introduction. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 63:967–973
Lea AJ, Blumstein DT, Wey TW, Martin JGA (2010) Heritable victimization and the benefits of agonistic relationships. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:21587–21592
Lee PC (1999) Comparative primate socioecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Lusseau D (2003) The emergent properties of a dolphin social network. Proc R Soc Lond B 270:S186–S188
Madden JR, Drewe JA, Pearce GP, Clutton-Brock TH (2009) The social network structure of a wild meerkat population: 2. Intragroup interactions. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 64:81–95
Magurran AE (2005) Evolutionary biology: The Trinidadian guppy. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Manly BFJ (1995) A note on the analysis of species co-occurrences. Ecology 76:1109–1115
Marschall N (2007) Methodological pitfalls in social network analysis: Why current methods produce questionable results. VDM, Saarbrücken
McDonald DB (2007) Predicting fate from early connectivity in a social network. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104:10910–10914
Metz HAJ, Dienske H, de Jonge G, Putters FA (1983) Continuous-time Markov chains as models for animal behaviour. Bull Math Biol 45:643–658
Naug D (2008) Structure of the social network and its influence on transmission dynamics in a honeybee colony. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 62:1719–1725
Oh KP, Badyaev AV (2010) Structure of social networks in a passerine bird: consequences for sexual selection and the evolution of mating strategies. Am Nat 176:E80–E89
Perreault C (2010) A note on reconstructing animal social networks from independent small-group observations. Anim Behav 80:551–562
Pike TW, Samanta M, Lindstroem J, Royle NJ (2008) Behavioural phenotype affects social interactions in an animal network. Proc R Soc Lond B 275:2515–2520
Pinter-Wollman N, Hobson EA, Smith JE, Edelman AJ, Shizuka D et al (2013) The dynamics of animal social networks: analytical, conceptual, and theoretical advances. Behav Ecol. doi:10.1093/beheco/art047
Ramos-Fernandez G, Boyer D, Aureli F, Vick LG (2009) Association networks in spider monkeys (Ateles geoffroyi). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 63:999–1013
Riesch R, Plath M, Schlupp I (2011) Toxic hydrogen sulphide and dark caves: pronounced male life-history divergence among locally adapted Poecilia mexicana (Poeciliidae). J Evol Biol 24:596–606
Santos FC, Pacheco JM, Lenaerts T (2006) Evolutionary dynamics of social dilemmas in structured heterogeneous populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103:3490–3494
Sendova-Franks AB, Hayward RK, Wulf B, Klimek T, James R et al (2010) Emergency networking: famine relief in ant colonies. Anim Behav 79:473–485
Sih A, Hanser SF, McHugh KA (2009) Social network theory: new insights and issues for behavioral ecologists. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 63:975–988
Snijders TAB, van de Bunt GG, Steglich CEG (2010) Introduction to stochastic actor-based models for network dynamics. Soc Networks 32:44–60
Sundaresan SR, Fischhoff IR, Dushoff J, Rubenstein DI (2007) Network metrics reveal differences in social organization between two fission-fusion species, Grevy’s zebra and onager. Oecologia 151:140–149
Sundaresan, Fischhoff IR, Dushoff J (2009) Avoiding spurious findings of nonrandom social structure in association data. Anim Behav 77:1381–1385
Watts DJ, Strogatz SH (1998) Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature 393:440–442
Wey T, Blumstein DT, Shen W, Jordan F (2008) Social network analysis of animal behaviour: a promising tool for the study of sociality. Anim Behav 75:333–344
Williams R, Lusseau D (2006) A killer whale social network is vulnerable to targeted removals. Biol Lett 2:497–500
Wolf JBW, Mawdsley D, Trillmich F, James R (2007) Social structure in a colonial mammal: unravelling hidden structural layers and their foundations by network analysis. Anim Behav 74:1293–1302
Acknowledgments
ADM Wilson acknowledges financial support from research fellowships from the Alexander von Humboldt foundation and IGB. RC was supported by an IGB studentship, KB by a Nafög studentship and DPC by funding from the Leverhulme Trust. We would like to thank Kharan Deonarinesingh for assistance in the field.
Ethical standards
This research was performed in accordance with the laws, guidelines and ethical standards of the country in which they were performed (Trinidad).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by J. Lindström
ADM Wilson and S Krause are shared first authors
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
ESM 1
(DOCX 18 kb)
Fig. S1
Frequency distributions of (a) the lengths of contact with a particular nearest neighbour, (b) the lengths of social contact, and (c) the lengths of being alone in the observed data (grey diamonds) and in a simulation of the very simple model that uses unconditional probabilities p(i) and p(x) of being social and of being alone, respectively (black circles) (DOC 68 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wilson, A.D.M., Krause, S., James, R. et al. Dynamic social networks in guppies (Poecilia reticulata). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 68, 915–925 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-014-1704-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-014-1704-0