Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Changing with the times: little penguins exhibit flexibility in foraging behaviour and low behavioural consistency

  • Original paper
  • Published:
Marine Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Individual foraging consistency is commonly seen in wild populations, even in species considered generalists and allows individuals to forage more efficiently. It may, therefore, have important consequences on ecological processes, for individuals and populations. Within seabirds, data on timescales over which consistency is maintained is lacking, despite its potential to determine how adaptable individuals and populations are to face environmental changes. Little penguins (Eudyptula minor) were tracked at two colonies in south-eastern Australia during 5 years, using GPS data loggers and dive recorders. This study investigated the presence of behavioural consistency, its persistence through time and the influence of extrinsic and intrinsic factors on behaviour and consistency. Individual consistency was compared between colonies, among consecutive foraging trips, among different breeding stages/clutches and years. Individuals showed high plasticity, with foraging metrics influenced by site, year, stage/clutch. Low to moderate short-term consistency in foraging metrics was highlighted, except for bearing. Over larger timescales, no consistency in these metrics was detected. Mass and morphology are known to influence foraging behaviour and consistency, but seemed not to affect behavioural consistency, which varied with year and site instead. This further highlights the plasticity of animals foraging on prey highly spatially and temporally variable in their distribution. We emphasize the importance of taking timescale into account when assessing behavioural consistency. Finally, mechanisms other than behavioural consistency seem to allow little penguins to find mobile food in the water column (e.g. group foraging, and switching from short to long trips at specific times of the breeding season).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agostinelli C, Lund U (2011) R package circular: circular statistics (version 0.4-3). http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=circular

  • Araújo MS, Bolnick DI, Layman CA (2011) The ecological causes of individual specialisation. Ecol Lett 14:948–958. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01662.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton K (2013) R package MuMIn: Multi-model inference (version 1.9.5). http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=MuMIn

  • Bell AM, Hankison SJ, Laskowski KL (2009) The repeatability of behaviour: a meta-analysis. Anim Behav 77:771–783

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berlincourt M, Arnould JPY (2014) At-sea associations in foraging little penguins. PLoS One 9:e105065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berlincourt M, Arnould JPY (2015) Influence of environmental conditions on foraging behaviour and its consequences on reproductive performance in Little penguins. Mar Biol 162:1485–1501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolnick DI, Svanbäck R, Fordyce JA, Yang LH, Davis JM, Hulsey CD, Forister ML (2003) The ecology of individuals: incidence and implications of individual specialization. Am Nat 161:1–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calenge C (2006) The package “adehabitat” for the R software: a tool for the analysis of space and habitat use by animals. Ecol Model 197:516–519. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.03.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camprasse ECM, Cherel Y, Arnould JPY, Hoskins AJ, Bost CA (2017a) Combined bio-logging and stable isotopes reveal individual specialisations in a benthic coastal seabird, the Kerguelen shag. PLoS One 12:e0172278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camprasse ECM, Cherel Y, Bustamante P, Arnould JPY, Bost CA (2017b) Intra- and inter-individual variation in the foraging ecology of a generalist subantarctic seabird, the Gentoo penguin. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. doi:10.3354/meps12151

    Google Scholar 

  • Castillo-Guerrero JA, Lerma M, Mellink E, Suazo-Guillén E, Peñaloza-Padilla EA (2016) Environmentally-mediated flexible foraging strategies in Brown boobies in the Gulf of California. Ardea 104:33–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ceia FR, Ramos JA (2015) Individual specialization in the foraging and feeding strategies of seabirds: a review. Mar Biol 162:1923–1938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ceia FR, Phillips RA, Ramos JA, Cherel Y, Vieira RP, Richard P, Xavier JC (2012) Short- and long-term consistency in the foraging niche of Wandering albatrosses. Mar Biol 159:1581–1591. doi:10.1007/s00227-012-1946-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiaradia A, Nisbet ICT (2006) Plasticity in parental provisioning and chick growth in little penguins Eudyptula minor in years of high and low breeding success. Ardea 94:257–270

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiaradia A, McBride J, Murray T, Dann P (2007a) Effect of fog on the arrival time of little penguins Eudyptula minor: a clue for visual orientation? J Ornithol 148:229–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiaradia A, Ropert-Coudert Y, Kato A, Mattern T, Yorke J (2007b) Diving behaviour of Little penguins from four colonies across their whole distribution range: bathymetry affecting diving effort and fledging success. Mar Biol 151:1535–1542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiaradia A, Forero MG, Hobson KA, Cullen JM (2010) Changes in diet and trophic position of a top predator 10 years after a mass mortality of a key prey. ICES J Mar Sci 67:1710–1720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook TR, Cherel Y, Tremblay Y (2006) Foraging tactics of chick-rearing Crozet shags: individuals display repetitive activity and diving patterns over time. Polar Biol 29:562–569. doi:10.1007/s00300-005-0089-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook TR, Lescroël A, Cherel Y, Kato A, Bost CA (2013) Can foraging ecology drive the evolution of body size in a diving endotherm? PLoS One 8:e56297. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0056297

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cullen JM, Montague TL, Hull C (1992) Food of little penguins Eudyptula minor in Victoria: comparison of three localities between 1985 and 1988. Emu 91:318–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dann P, Norman F (2006) Population regulation in little penguins Eudyptula minor: the role of intraspecific competition for nesting sites and food during breeding. Emu 106:289–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davoren GK, Montevecchi WA, Anderson JT (2003) Search strategies of a pursuit-diving marine bird and the persistence of prey patches. Ecol Monogr 73:463–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deagle BE, Gales NJ, Hindell MA (2008) Variability in foraging behaviour of chick-rearing Macaroni penguins Eudyptes chrysolophus and its relation to diet. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 359:295–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deagle BE, Chiaradia A, McInnes J, Jarman SN (2010) Pyrosequencing faecal DNA to determine diet of little penguins: is what goes in what comes out? Conserv Genet 11:2039–2048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dingemanse NJ, Dochtermann NA (2013) Quantifying individual variation in behaviour: mixed-effect modelling approaches. J Anim Ecol 82:39–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott KH, Woo KJ, Gaston AJ (2009) Specialization in murres: the story of eight specialists. Waterbirds 32:491–506. doi:10.1675/063.032.0402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Estes JA, Riedman ML, Staedler MM, Tinker MT, Lyon BE (2003) Individual variation in prey selection by Sea otters: patterns, causes and implications. J Anim Ecol 72:144–155. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2656.2003.00690.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fodrie FJ, Yeager LA, Grabowski JH, Layman CA, Sherwood GD, Kenworthy MD (2015) Measuring individuality in habitat use across complex landscapes: approaches, constraints, and implications for assessing resource specialization. Oecologia 178:75–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fullagar PJ, Heyligers PC, Crowley MA, Klomp NI (1995) Gabo Island penguin survey November 1994. MI Partners Report No 4. Moruya, NSW

    Google Scholar 

  • Gales R, Williams C, Ritz D (1990) Foraging behaviour of the little penguin Eudyptula minor: initial results and assessment of instrument effect. J Zool 220:61–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grémillet D, Charmantier A (2010) Shifts in phenotypic plasticity constrain the value of seabirds as ecological indicators of marine ecosystems. Ecol Appl 20:1498–1503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamer K, Humphreys E, Garthe S, Hennicke J, Peters G, Grémillet D, Phillips R, Harris M, Wanless S (2007) Annual variation in diets, feeding locations and foraging behaviour of gannets in the North Sea: flexibility, consistency and constraint. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 338:295–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris S, Raya Rey A, Zavalaga C, Quintana F (2014) Strong temporal consistency in the individual foraging behaviour of Imperial shags Phalacrocorax atriceps. Ibis 156:523–533. doi:10.1111/ibi.12159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobday DK (1991) Abundance and distribution of pilchard and Australian anchovy as prey species for the Little penguin Eudyptula minor at Phillip Island, Victoria. Emu 91:342–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoskins AJ, Dann P, Ropert-Coudert Y, Kato A, Chiaradia A, Costa DP, Arnould JPY (2008) Foraging behaviour and habitat selection of the Little penguin Eudyptula minor during early chick rearing in Bass Strait, Australia. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 366:293–303. doi:10.3354/meps07507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ishikawa K, Watanuki Y (2002) Sex and individual differences in foraging behavior of Japanese cormorants in years of different prey availability. J Ethol 20:49–54. doi:10.1007/s10164-002-0053-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kato A, Watanuki Y, Nishiumi I, Kuroki M, Shaughnessy P, Naito Y (2000) Variation in foraging and parental behavior of King cormorants. Auk 117:718–730. doi:10.1642/0004-8038(2000)117[0718:VIFAPB]2.0.CO;2

  • Kato A, Ropert-Coudert Y, Chiaradia A (2008) Regulation of trip duration by an inshore forager, the Little penguin Eudyptula minor, during incubation. Auk 125:588–593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kernaléguen L, Arnould JPY, Guinet C, Cherel Y (2015a) Determinants of individual foraging specialization in large marine vertebrates, the Antarctic and Subantarctic fur seals. J Anim Ecol 84:1081–1092. doi:10.1111/1365-2656.12347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kernaléguen L, Dorville N, Ierodiaconou D, Hoskins AJ, Baylis AMM, Hindell MA, Semmens J, Abernathy K, Marshall GJ, Cherel Y, Arnould JPY (2015b) From video recordings to whisker stable isotopes: a critical evaluation of timescale in assessing individual foraging specialisation in Australian fur seals. Oecologia 180:657–670. doi:10.1007/s00442-015-3407-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knudsen R, Primicerio R, Amundsen PA, Klemetsen A (2010) Temporal stability of individual feeding specialization may promote speciation. J Anim Ecol 79:161–168. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2656.2009.01625.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kowalczyk ND, Chiaradia A, Preston TJ, Reina RD (2014) Linking dietary shifts and reproductive failure in seabirds: a stable isotope approach. Funct Ecol 28:755–765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kowalczyk ND, Reina RD, Preston TJ, Chiaradia A (2015) Environmental variability drives shifts in the foraging behaviour and reproductive success of an inshore seabird. Oecologia 178:967–979

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Layman CA, Allgeier JE (2012) Characterizing trophic ecology of generalist consumers: a case study of the invasive lionfish in The Bahamas. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 448:131–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lescroël A, Bost CA (2005) Foraging under contrasting oceanographic conditions: the Gentoo penguin at Kerguelen Archipelago. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 302:245–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lima FP, Wethey DS (2012) Three decades of high-resolution coastal sea surface temperatures reveal more than warming. Nat Commun 3:704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loxdale HD, Lushai G, Harvey JA (2011) The evolutionary improbability of ‘generalism’ in nature, with special reference to insects. Biol J Linn Soc 103:1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luque SP (2007) Diving behaviour analysis in R. R news 7:8–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Matich P, Heithaus MR, Layman CA (2011) Contrasting patterns of individual specialization and trophic coupling in two marine apex predators. J Anim Ecol 80:294–305. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2656.2010.01753.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre T, Bester MN, Bornemann H, Tosh CA, de Bruyn PJN (2017) Slow to change? Individual fidelity to three-dimensional foraging habitats in Southern elephant seals Mirounga leonina. Anim Behav 127:91–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Novak M, Tinker MT (2015) Timescales alter the inferred strength and temporal consistency of intraspecific diet specialization. Oecologia 178:61–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Numata M, Davis LS, Renner M (2000) Prolonged foraging trips and egg desertion in little penguins Eudyptula minor. N Z J Zool 27:277–289. doi:10.1080/03014223.2000.9518236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinheiro JC, Bates DM, DebRoy S, Sarkar D (2014) R package nlme: linear and nonlinear mixed effects models (version 3.1-117). http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlme

  • Ratcliffe N, Takahashi A, O’Sullivan C, Adlard S, Trathan PN, Harris MP, Wanless S (2013) The roles of sex, mass and individual specialisation in partitioning foraging-depth niches of a pursuit-diving predator. PLoS One 8:e79107

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2015) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/

  • Reilly PN (1974) Breeding of little penguins along the Great Australian Bight. Emu 74:198–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ropert-Coudert Y, Kato A, Naito Y, Cannell BL (2003) Individual diving strategies in the Little penguin. Waterbirds 26:403–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ropert-Coudert Y, Wilson RP, Daunt F, Kato A (2004) Patterns of energy acquisition by a central place forager: benefits of alternating short and long foraging trips. Behav Ecol 15:824–830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ropert-Coudert Y, Kato A, Chiaradia A (2009) Impact of small-scale environmental perturbations on local marine food resources: a case study of a predator, the Little penguin. Proc Biol Sci 276:4105–4109. doi:10.1098/rspb.2009.1399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saraux C, Robinson-Laverick SM, Le Maho Y, Ropert-Coudert Y, Chiaradia A (2011) Plasticity in foraging strategies of inshore birds: how little penguins maintain body reserves while feeding offspring. Ecology 92:1909–1916

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stahel C, Gales R, Burrell J (1987) Little penguin: Fairy penguins in Australia. New South Wales University Press, Kensington

    Google Scholar 

  • Sumner MD (2009) Trip: tools for the analysis of animal track data (R package version 1.1-17). http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=trip

  • Sutton GJ, Hoskins AJ, Arnould JPY (2015) Benefits of group foraging depend on prey type in a small marine predator, the Little penguin. PLoS One 10:e0144297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vander Zanden HB, Bolten AB, Tucker AD, Hart KM, Lamont MM, Fujisaki I, Reich KJ, Addison DS, Mansfield KL, Phillips KF (2016) Biomarkers reveal sea turtles remained in oiled areas following the deepwater horizon oil spill. Ecol Appl 26:2145–2155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wanless S, Harris MP (1993) Use of mutually exclusive foraging areas by adjacent colonies of Blue-eyed shags Phalacrocorax atriceps at South Georgia. Colon Waterbirds 16:176–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watanuki Y, Ishikawa K, Takahashi A, Kato A (2004) Foraging behavior of a generalist marine top predator, Japanese cormorants Phalacrocorax filamentosus, in years of demersal versus epipelagic prey. Mar Biol 145:427–434. doi:10.1007/s00227-004-1345-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woo KJ, Elliott KH, Davidson M, Gaston AJ, Davoren GK (2008) Individual specialization in diet by a generalist marine predator reflects specialization in foraging behaviour. J Anim Ecol 77:1082–1091. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2656.2008.01429.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuur AF, Ieno EN, Walker NJ, Saveliev AA, Smith GM (2009) Statistics for biology and health. In: Gail M, Krickeberg K, Samet JM, Tsiatis a, Wong W (eds) Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. Springer, New York, NY

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was approved by the Deakin University ethics committee and therefore meets ethics guidelines. The assistance of numerous volunteers in data collection, including Selina Kent, Lauren Angel and Melanie Wells, is gratefully acknowledged. The authors would like to thank Norman Ratcliffe for providing advice on statistical analyses.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University (Burwood Campus), Geelong, Australia

    Elodie C. M. Camprasse, Grace J. Sutton, Maud Berlincourt & John P. Y. Arnould

Authors
  1. Elodie C. M. Camprasse
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Grace J. Sutton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Maud Berlincourt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. John P. Y. Arnould
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elodie C. M. Camprasse.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving animals were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Deakin University ethics committee, which approved the study. All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.

Funding

The study was funded in part by the Holsworth Wildlife Research Endowment and the Winifred Violet Scott Trust.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: V. H. Paiva.

Reviewed by K. Shiomi and an undisclosed expert.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 171 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Camprasse, E.C.M., Sutton, G.J., Berlincourt, M. et al. Changing with the times: little penguins exhibit flexibility in foraging behaviour and low behavioural consistency. Mar Biol 164, 169 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-017-3193-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-017-3193-y

Search

Navigation