Skip to main content
Log in

Matters of modernity, late modernity and self-identity in distance education

  • Published:
European Journal of Psychology of Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Open and distance education represents contemporary forms of education which are responding to the shift to late-modernity, especially in the forms of technology and media employed, but also in terms of the attenuated relationships between teachers and students. It is argued that distance education can be seen as a creature of modernity which has provided important foundations for the ways open education is constructed. Drawing on the work of Anthony Giddens, the author uncovers some of the relationships between distance education, late-modernity and the self. Issues are raised concerning the personal risks and benefits involved in emerging forms of open and distance education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ashton, J. (1971).Out of the silence. Adelaide: Investigator Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, D. (1974).The coming of post-industrial society. London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braverman, H. (1974).Labour and monopoly capital: the degradation of work in the twentieth century. London: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campion, M. (1992). Revealing links: post-Fordism, postmodernism and distance education. In T. D. Evans & P. A. Juler (Eds.),Research in Distance Education 2 (pp. 45–51). Geelong: Deakin University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campion, M. (1994). Implications for research in distance education of the distinction between exogenous and endogenous factors. In T. D. Evans & D. Murphy (Eds.),Research in distance education 3 (pp. 204–212). Geelong: Deakin University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campion, M., & Renner, B (1991). The supposed demise of Fordism: implications for distance education and higher education.Distance education, 13 (1), 7–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, T. D. (1991). An Evaluation of Classroom Processes. In H. Altrichter, T. D. Evans, & A. R. Morgan (Eds.),Windows: research and evaluation on a distance education course (pp. 139–173). Geelong: Deakin University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, T. D. (1994a). Opening education: some reflections on open learning, educational technology and educational reform. In B. Luke (Ed.),Northern Territory Open Learning Conference (pp. 1–18). Northern Territory University, Darwin: Northern Territory University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, T. D. (1994b).Understanding learners in open and distance education. London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, T. D., & Grace, M. (forthcoming). Distance education and the gendered privatisation of learning.Journal of curriculum studies.

  • Evans, T. D., & Nation, D. E. (1989). Critical reflections in distance education. In T. D. Evans & D. E. Nation (Eds.),Critical reflections on distance education (pp. 237–252). Brighton: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, T. D., & Nation, D. E. (1993a). Adapting classroom technologies for distance education: telematics in Victoria. In T. Nunan (Ed.),Distance education futures: the proceedings of the Australian & South Pacific External Studies Association biennial forum (pp. 105–113). Adelaide: University of South Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, T. D., & Nation, D. E. (1993b). Educational technologies: reforming open and distance education. In T. D. Evans & D. E. Nation (Eds.),Reforming open and distance education (pp. 196–214). London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, T. D., & Newell, C. J. (1993). Computer mediated communication for postgraduate research. In T. Nunan (Ed.),Distance education futures: the proceedings of the Australian and South Pacific External Studies Association biennial forum (pp. 81–91). Adelaide: University of South Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibb, P. (1986).Classrooms a world apart: the story of the Broken Hill School of the Air. Melbourne: Spectrum Publications.

  • Gibbs, G., Morgan, A. R., & Taylor, E (1984). The world of the learner. In F. Marton N. Entwistle & D. Hounsell (Eds.),The experience of learning (pp. 165–188). Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1984).The constitution of society. Cambridge. Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1991a).Modernity and self-identity: self and society in the late modern age. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1991b).The consequences of modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1959).The presentation of self in everyday life. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grace, M. (1991).Communication and meaning: the first year experience of off-campus study. Unpublished doctoral thesis. Deakin University, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guy, R. (1991). Distance education and the developing world. In T. D. Evans & B. King (Ed.),Beyond the text: contemporary writing on distance education (pp. 152–175). Geelong: Deakin University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guy, R. (1994).A postpositivist understanding of distance education in Papua New Guinea. Unpublished doctoral thesis. Deakin University, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1987).The philosophical, discourse of modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, D. (1987).Openness and closure in distance education. Brighton: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, D. (1991). Towards a critical educational teachnology in distance education. In T. D. Evans & B. King (Eds.),Beyond the text: contemporary writing on distance education (pp. 204–225). Geelong. Deakin University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, D. (1993). Distance education at the margins. In T. D. & N. Evans D. E. (Ed.),Reforming open and distance education (pp. 55–71). London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakupec, V., & Nicoll., K. (forthcoming). Open learning: politics or pedagogy.Distance Education.

  • Kember, D. (1989). An illustration, with case studies, of a linear-process model of drop-out from distance education.Distance education, 10 (2), 196–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyotard, J. (1985).The post-modern condition. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mac Rae, H. (1990). Older women and identity maintenance in later life.Canadian Journal on Aging, 9, 248–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLuhan, M. (1967).Understanding media. London: Sphere.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moodie, G., & Nation, D. E. (1993). Reforming a system of distance education. In T. D. Evans & D. E. Nation (Ed.),Reforming open and distance education (pp. 130–149). London. Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, A. R. (1993).Improving your students’ learning. London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, A. R., & Thorpe, M. (1993). Residential schools in open and distance education: quality time for quality learning? In T. D. Evans & D. E. Nation (Eds.),Reforming open and distance education (pp. 72–87). London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Motley, C., & Starr, B. (1990).Bush tracks and radio waves: a history of Port Augusta School of the Air, 1958–1990. Adelaide: Tread Softly Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, O. (1983). Distance teaching and industrial production: a comparative interpretation in outline. In D. Sewart, D. Keegan, & B Holmberg (Eds.),Distance education: international perspectives (pp. 95–113). London: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, O. (1989). The iceberg has not melted: further reflections on the concept of industrialisation and distance teaching.Open Learning, 4 (3), 3–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, D., Boyton, B., Buete, S., & Dawson, D. (1991). Applying Kember’s linear-process model to distance education at Charles Sturt University.Distance Education, 12 (1), 54–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rumble, G. (1989). “Open learning”, “distance learning” and the misuse of language.Open Learning, 4 (2), 28–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, E., Morgan, A. R., & Gibbs, G. (1981).The orientation of Open University students to their studies.Teaching at a Distance, 20, 3–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, J. (1994). Open learning: the answer to the government’s equity problems. A report on a study of the potential impact of the Open Learning Initiative on people with disabilities.Distance Education, 15 (1), 94–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, R. (1993). Open learning and the media. In T. D. Evans & D. E. Nation (Eds.),Reforming open and distance education (pp. 15–35). London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallerstein, I. (1974).The modern world system. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Evans, T. Matters of modernity, late modernity and self-identity in distance education. Eur J Psychol Educ 10, 169–180 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03172914

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03172914

Key words

Navigation