Skip to main content
Log in

Learning in science: Some wider perspectives

  • Published:
Research in Science Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • ANDERSON, J.R. (1980)Cognitive psychology and its implications. San Francisco, Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • ARMSTRONG, S.L., GLEITMAN, L.R., & GLEITMAN, H. (1983) What some concepts might not be.Cognition, 13, 263–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • AUSUBEL, D.P. (1968)Educational psychology: a cognitive view. New York: Halt, Rinehart & Pinston.

    Google Scholar 

  • BRUNER, J.S. (1966)Toward a theory of instruction. Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • COLLINS, A.M., & LOFTUS, E.F. (1975) A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing.Psychological Review, 82 (6), 407–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • FENSHAM, P., GARRARD, J.E., & WEST, L. (1981) The use of cognitive mapping in teaching and learning strategies.Research in Science Education, 11, 121–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • GAGNE, R.M. (1965)The conditions of learning. New York, Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • GARRARD, J. (1987)Young people's beliefs and attitudes about drugs. Paper presented at the Second National Drug Educators' Workshop, Canberra.

  • GLEITMAN, L.R., ARMSTRONG, S.L., & GLEITMAN, H. (1983) On doubting the concept ‘concept’. In E.K. Scholnick (Ed.)New trends in cognitive representation: challenges to Piaget's theory? Hillsdale, N.J., Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • GUNSTONE, R.F., WHITE, R.T., & FENSHAM, P.J. (1986)Developments in style and purpose of research on the learning of science. Paper presented at NARST, San Francisco.

  • HODSON, D. (1985) Philosphy of science, science and science education.Studies in Science Education, 12, 25–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • HUNT, M. (1982)The universe within. New York, Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • JOHNSON-LAIRD, P.J. (1984) Deductive thinking: how we reason. In M.S. Gazzaniga (Ed.)Handbook of cognitive neuroscience. New York, Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • KARPLUS, R. (1975) The learning cycle. In F.P. Collea, R.G. Fuller, et al.Workshop on physics teaching and the development of reasoning. New York, American Association of Physics Teachers.

    Google Scholar 

  • LAWSON, A.E. (1982) The reality of general cognitive operations.Science Education, 66(2), 229–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • LINCOLN, Y.S., & GUBA, E.G. (1985)Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • MISIAK, H., & SEXTON, V.S. (1966).History of psychology: an overview. New York, Grune & Stratton.

    Google Scholar 

  • NEIMARK, E. (1983) There is one classification system with a long developmental history. In E.K. Scholnick (Ed.)New trends in cognitive representation: challenges to Piaget's theory? Hillsdale, N.J., Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • NOVAK, J.D. (1977)A theory of education. Ithaca, Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • NOVAK, J.D. (1978) An alternative to Piagetian psychology for science and mathematics education.Studies in Science Education, 5, 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • OSBORNE, R., & WITTROCK, M. (1983). Learning science: a generative process.Science Education, 67 (4), 489–508.

    Google Scholar 

  • OSBORNE, R., & WITTROCK, M. (1985). The generative learning model and its implications for science education.Studies in Science Education, 12, 59–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • PIAGET, J. (1964) Cognitive development in children: development and learning.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2, 176–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • PINES, A.L. (1981)A taxonomy of conceptual relationships: a proposal for research in curriculum development and the evaluation of cognitive structure. Paper presented at AERA, Los Angeles.

  • PINES, A.L. (1985) Toward a taxonomy of conceptual relations and the implications for the evaluation of cognitive structure. In L.H.T. West & A.L. Pines (Eds.),Cognitive structure and conceptual change. New York, Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ROSCH, E. (1983) Prototype classification and logical classification: the two systems. In E.K. Scholnick (Ed.)New trends in cognitive representation: challenges to Piaget's theory? Hillsdale, N.J., Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • WEGNER, D.M., & VALLACHER, R.R. (1977)Implicit psychology: an introduction to social cognition. New York, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • WEST, L.H.T., FENSHAM, P.J., & GARRARD, J.E. (1982)Describing the cognitive structure of undergraduate chemistry students. Unpublished report, Higher Education Advisory and Research Unit, Monash University.

  • WEST, L. (1984) Learning large bodies of discipline knowledge.HERDSA News, 6 (3), 8–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • WEST, L., & PINES, L. (1984) An interpretation of research in conceptual understanding within a sources of knowledge framework.Research in Science Education, 14, 47–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • WHITE, R.T. (1983) Research in science education: the past ten years and the next five.Research in Science Education, 13, 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION, (1981) Memorandum.Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 59 (2), 225–42.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Garrard, J. Learning in science: Some wider perspectives. Research in Science Education 17, 11–22 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02357167

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02357167

Keywords

Navigation