Skip to main content
Log in

Creative learning in science education

  • Published:
Research in Science Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Conclusion

Making sense of the world-including the world of school learning-involves making connections between new and existing experiences. Whether this process is called the construction (Piaget, 1929), the generation (Osborne & Wittrock, 1985) or the creation of meaning, the relation of new experiences to existing understandings, images, experiences, and feelings are essential to the process of learning with understanding.

For many years cognitive psychology has focused on the making of logical, sequential, highly structured connections. However, the computer metaphor for human information processing and storage is now being questioned and cognitive psychologists are beginning to explore the new ‘unexplorable’-parallel, holistic, divergent, creative mental processes.

In addition, this paper proposes a model of the learning process in terms of reciprocally interactive cognitive, affective, and social variables.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AUSUBEL, D.P. (1968)Educational psychology: a cognitive view. New York, Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • BANDURA, A. (1977a)Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • BANDURA, A. (1977b) Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change.Psychological Review, 84, 191–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • BECK, A.T. (1976)Cognitive therapy and the emotional disorders. New York, International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • BROWN, G.I. (1971)Human teaching for human learning. New York, The Viking Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • BROWN, G.I. (ed.) (1975)The living classroom: innovation through confluent education and Gestalt. New York, The Viking Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • BRUNER, J.S. (1966)Toward a theory of instruction. Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • BURNS, D.D. (1980)Feeling good: the new mood therapy. New York, William Morrow and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • CARELLO, C., TURVEY, M.T., KUGLER, P.N., & SHAW, R.E. (1984) Inadequacies of the computer metaphor. In M.S. Gazzaniga (ed.)Handbook of cognitive neuroscience. New York, Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DEWEY, J. (1933)How we think: a restatement of the relation of thinking to the education process. Boston, D.C. Heath and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • ELLIS, A. (1962)Reason and emotion in psychotherapy. New York, Lyle Stuart.

    Google Scholar 

  • GAGNE, R.M. (1965)The conditions of learning. New York, Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • GHISELIN, B. (1955)The creative process. New York, Mentor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • HADAMARD, J.S. (1954)The psychology of invention in the mathematical field. New York, Dover Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • HODSON, D. (1985) Philosophy of science, science and science education.Studies in Science Education, 12, 25–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • HUNT, M. (1982)The universe within. New York, Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • KAHA, C.W. (1983) The creative mind: form and process.Journal of Creative Behavior, 17(2), 84–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • KOESTLER, A. (1964)The act of creation. New York, Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • MASSIALAS, B.G. & ZEVIN, J. (1983)Teaching creatively: learning through discovery. Malabar, Robert E. Krieger Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • NEWMAN, J.R. (ed.) (1956)The world of mathematics. New York, Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • NODDINGS, N. & SHORE, P.J. (1984)Awakening the inner eye: intuition in education. New York, Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • NOVAK, J.D. (1977)A theory of education. Ithaca, Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • OSBORNE, R. & WITTROCK, M. (1985) The generative learning model and its implications for science education.Studies in Science Education, 12, 59–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • OWENS, J., BOWER, G.H., & BLACK, J.B. (1979) The ‘soap opera’ effect in story recall.Memory and Cognition, 7, 185–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • PHILLIPS, D.C. (1983) On describing a student's cognitive structure.Educational Psychologist, 18(2), 59–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • PIAGET, J. (1929)The child's conception of the world. London, Paladin.

    Google Scholar 

  • PIAGET, J. (1964) Cognitive development in children: development and learning.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2, 176–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • POSNER, G.J., STRIKE, K.A., HEWSON, P.W. & GERTZOG, W.A. (1982) Accom modation of a scientific conception: toward a theory of conceptual change.Science Education, 66(2), 211–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • RICHARDSON, A. (1984)The experiential dimension of psychology. St. Lucia, University of Queensland Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ROGERS, C.R. (1969)Freedom to learn. Columbus, Ohio, Charles E. Merrill Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • SHUELL, T.J. (1985) Knowledge representation, cognitive structure, and school learning: a historical perspective. In L.H.T. West & A.L. Pines (eds).Cognitive structure and conceptual change. New York, Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • WILLIAMS, L.V. (1983)Teaching for the two-sided mind. Englewood Cliffs, N.J., Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Garrard, J. Creative learning in science education. Research in Science Education 16, 1–10 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02356812

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02356812

Keywords

Navigation