Abstract
The focus with which the paper is concerned is the process or task of intervention and, more specifically, the exploration of three (overlapping and interacting) questions pertinent to those who would intervene:
-
What is to be done?
-
How shall we decide what to do?
-
What can guide our actions?
In terms of what we will describe as pragmatic pluralism (our response to these questions), we intend this to be read in several different ways and on several different levels. Illustrating the discussion with examples from a number of different case studies, we will talk about pluralism in each of the following features:
-
in the use of specific methods/techniques
-
in the role(s) of the interventionists
-
in the modes of representation employed
-
in the use of different rationalities
-
in the ‘nature’ of the client
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Burrell, G., and Morgan, G. (1979).Sociological Paradigms and Organisational Analysis, Heinnemann, London.
Butler, J. P. (1990).Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity, Routledge, New York.
Chambers, R. (1994). Participatory rural appraisal: Analysis of experience.World Dev. 22(9), 1253–1268.
Deleuze, G., and Guattari, F. (1980).A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia (tr., B. Massumi), Athlone, London.
Derrida, J. (1978).Writing and Difference, Routledge, London.
Dreyfus, H. L., and Rabinow, P. (1982).Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics, Harvester, Brighton.
Eco, U. (1984).The Name of the Rose, Picador, London.
Fox, N. J. (1991). Postmodernism, rationality and the evaluation of health care.Sociol. Rev. 394, 709–744.
Freire, P. (1972).Pedagogy of the Oppressed, Sheed and Ward, London.
Haraway, D. J. (1991).Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature, Free Association Books, London.
Heldke, L. (1988). Recipes for theory making.Hypatia 3, 15–29.
Hooks, b. (1990). Postmodern blackness.Postmodern Cult. 1(1).
Jacques, R. (1989). Post-industrialism, postmodernity and OR: Toward a ‘custom and practice’ of responsibility and possibility. In Jackson, M. C., Keys, P., and Cropper, S. A. (eds.),Operational Research and the Social Sciences, Plenum, New York, pp. 703–708.
Latour, B. (1987).Science in Action, Open University Press, Milton Keynes, London.
Legge, K. (1984).Evaluating planned organisational change. Academic Press, London.
Mabin, V., and Davies, J. (1995). Framing and reframing in problem structuring. InProceedings of the 31st Annual New Zealand Operational Research Society Conference, Wellington, 31 August–1 September 1995, pp. 229–236.
Rorty, R. (1989).Contingency, Irony and Solidarity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Taket, A. R. (1993). Mixing and matching? OR and innovatory health promotion projects.OR Insight 6(4), 18–23.
Taket, A. R., and White, L. A. (1993). After OR: An agenda for postmodernism and poststructuralism in OR.J. Oper. Res. Soc. 44(9), 867–881.
Taket, A. R., and White, L. A. (1994). Doing community operational research with multicultural groups.Omega Int. J. Manage. Sci. 22(6), 579–588.
Taket, A. R., and White, L. A. (1995a). Working with heterogeneity: A pluralist strategy for evaluation. InProceedings of the 4th International Conference of UKSS: Critical Issues in Systems Theory and Practice, Hull, July 1995, Plenum, New York, pp. 517–522.
Taket, A. R., and White, L. A. (1995b). Visible responsibility: A guide for critical action. InProceedings of the 39th Annual Meeting of the ISSS: Systems Thinking, Government Policy and Decision Making, Amsterdam, July 1995, pp. 1054–1061.
Taket, A. R., and White, L. A. (1996). Re-presenting organisational intervention: Passionate pragmatic pluralism in practice (in press).
Thompson, J. C. (1992). Program evaluation within a health promotion framework.Can. J. Public Health 83(Suppl. 1), S67-S71.
White, L. A. (1994). Development options for a rural community in Belize—Alternative development and operational research.Int. Trans. Oper. Res. 1(4), 453–462.
White, L. A. (1995). What is a model? (in press).
White, L. A., and Taket, A. R. (1993). Community OR—Doing what feels good.OR Insight 6(2), 20–23.
White, L. A., and Taket, A. R. (1994a). The death of the expert.J. Oper. Res. Soc. 45(7), 733–748.
White, L. A., and Taket, A. R. (1994b). Using rapid appraisal for evaluating the voluntary sector's delivery of health care programmes. InSYSTED 94. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Systems Sciences in Health and Social Services for the Elderly and the Disabled, Geneva CICG, 2–6 May 1994; Rey, J. C., and Tilquin, C. (eds.), Aarau, Institut Suisse dela santé publique, pp. 812–817.
White, L. A., and Taket, A. R. (1995a). Changing faces: An investigation of guises for intervention. InProceedings of the 39th Annual Meeting of the ISSS: Systems Thinking. Government Policy and Decision Making, Amsterdam, July 1995, pp. 1088–1097.
White, L. A., and Taket, A. R. (1995b). Quality is for sharing (in press).
White, L. A., and Taket, A. R. (1995c). Beyond appraisal: Participatory Appraisal of Needs and the Development of Action (PANDA) (in press).
Wittgenstein, L. (1969).Blue and Brown Books, Blackwell, Oxford.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Taket, A., White, L. Pragmatic pluralism—An explication. Systems Practice 9, 571–586 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02169214
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02169214