Skip to main content
Log in

Transformation of the flagella and associated flagellar components during cell division in the coccolithophoridPleurochrysis carterae

  • Published:
Protoplasma Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Immunofluorescence microscopy, conventional and high voltage transmission electron microscopy were used to describe changes in the flagellar apparatus during cell division in the motile, coccolithbearing cells ofPleurochrysis carterae (Braarud and Fagerlund) Christensen. New basal bodies appear alongside the parental basal bodies before mitosis and at prophase the large microtubular (crystalline) roots disassemble as their component microtubules migrate to the future spindle poles. By prometaphase the crystalline roots have disappeared; the flagellar axonemes shorten and the two pairs of basal bodies (each consisting of one parental and one daughter basal body) separate so that each pair is distal to a spindle pole. By late prometaphase the pairs of basal bodies bear diminutive flagellar roots for the future daughter cells. The long flagellum of each daughter cell is derived from the parental basal bodies; thus, the basal body that produces a short flagellum in the parent produces a long flagellum in the daughter cell. We conclude that each basal body in these cells is inherently identical but that a first generation basal body generates a short flagellum and in succeeding generations it produces a long flagellum. At metaphase a fibrous band connecting the basal bodies appears and the roots and basal bodies reorient to their interphase configuration. By telophase the crystalline roots have begun to reform and the rootlet microtubules have assumed their interphase appearance by early cytokinesis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CR1, CR2:

crystalline roots 1 and 2

CT:

cytoplasmic tongue microtubules

DIC:

differential interference contrast light microscopy

H:

haptonema

HVEM:

high voltage transmission electron microscopy

IMF:

immunofluorescence microscopy

L:

left flagellum/basal body

M:

metaphase plate

MT:

microtubule

N:

nucleus

R:

right flagellum/basal body

R1, R2, R3:

roots 1, 2, and 3

TEM:

transmission electron microscopy

References

  • Andersen RA (1985) The flagellar apparatus of the golden algaSynura uvella: four absolute orientations. Protoplasma 128: 94–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Asai DJ, Brokaw CJ, Thompson WC, Wilson L (1982) Two different monoclonal antibodies to alpha-tubulin inhibit the bending of reactivated sea urchin spermatozoa. Cell Motil 2: 599–614

    Google Scholar 

  • Beech PL, Wetherbee R (1988) Observations on the flagellar apparatus and peripheral endoplasmic reticulum of the coccolithophorid,Pleurochrysis carterae (Prymnesiophyceae). Phycologia 27: 142–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Gely C, Wright M (1986) The centriole cycle in the amoebae of the MyxomycetePhysarum polycephalum. Protoplasma 132: 23–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Hori T, Green JC (1985 a) The ultrastructure of mitosis inIsochrysis galbana Parke (Prymnesiophyceae). Protoplasma 125: 140–151

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1985 b) An ultrastructural study of mitosis in non-motile coccolith-bearing cells ofEmiliania huxleyi (Lohm.) Hay & Mohler (Prymnesiophyceae). Protistologica 21: 107–120

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1985 c) The ultrastructural changes during mitosis inImantonia rotunda Reynolds (Prymnesiophyceae). Bot Mar 27: 67–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Hori T, Inouye I (1981) The ultrastructure of mitosis inCricosphaera roscoffensis var.haptonemofera (Prymnesiophyceae). Protoplasma 106: 121–135

    Google Scholar 

  • McFadden GI, Schulze D, Surek B, Salisbury JL, Melkonian M (1987) Basal body reorientation mediated by a Ca2+-modulated contractile protein. J Cell Biol 105: 903–912

    Google Scholar 

  • Manton I (1964) Observations with the electron microscope on the division cycle in the flagellatePrymnesium parvum Carter. J R Micr Soc 83: 317–325

    Google Scholar 

  • Melkonian M, Reize IB, Preisig HR (1987) Maturation of a flagellum/basal body requires more than one cell cycle in algal flagellates: studies onNephroselmis olivacea (Prasinophyeae). In:Weissner W, Robinson DG, Starr RC (eds) Algal development, molecular and cellular aspects. Springer, Heidelberg New York, pp 102–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Mignot JP, Brugerolle G, Bricheux G (1987) Intercalary strip development and dividing cell morphogenesis in the euglenidCyclidiopsis acus. Protoplasma 139: 51–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickett-Heaps JD (1974) Plant microtubules. In:Robards AW (ed) Dynamic aspects of plant ultrastructure. McGraw-Hill, London, pp 219–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Reider CL, Borisy GG (1982) The centrosome cycle in PtK2 cells: Asymmetric distribution and structural changes in the pericentriolar material. Biol Cell 44: 117–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacey VJ, Pienaar RN (1980) Cell division inHymenomonas carterae (Braarud et Fagerlund) Braarud (Prymnesiophyceae). Br Phycol J 15: 365–376

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetherbee R, Platt SJ, Beech PL, Pickett-Heaps JD (1988) Flagellar transformation in the heterokontEpipyxis pulchra (Chrysophyceae): direct observations using image enhanced light microscopy. Protoplasma 145: 47–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright RL, Salisbury JL, Jarvik JW (1985) A nucleus-basal body connector inChlamydomonas reinhardtii that may function in basal body localization or segregation. J Cell Biol 101: 1903–1912

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Beech, P.L., Wetherbee, R. & Pickett-Heaps, J.D. Transformation of the flagella and associated flagellar components during cell division in the coccolithophoridPleurochrysis carterae . Protoplasma 145, 37–46 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01323254

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01323254

Keywords

Navigation