Skip to main content

Impediments and Model for Network Centrality Analysis of a Renewable Integrated Electricity Grid

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Green Energy and Technology ((GREEN))

Abstract

Inclusion of renewable energy changes the power flow direction of the trans- mission grid, resulting in a bidirectional flow model of the power transmission systems. The changing nature of the grid demands for new and improved techniques to analyze the vulnerability of the power grid. In this chapter, a method for identifying critical nodes for smart and bulk power transmission grid environment is presented. A new model based on bidirectional power flow is considered. Three different models of power system based on complex network framework are analyzed. Applicability of these methods in smart grid environment is evaluated. The consequence of removing critical nodes found from the analysis is discussed. Four measures of impact based on topological and electrical characteristics are tested. The efficacy of bidirectional model is studied through rank similarity analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Farhangi H (2010) The path of the smart grid. IEEE Power Energ Mag 8(1):18–28

    Google Scholar 

  2. Glover JD, Sarma MS, Overbye T (2011) Power system analysis and design. Fifth edition, Cengage Learning

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sood VK, Fischer D, Eklund JM, Brown T (2009) Developing a communication infrastructure for the smart grid. In: 2009 IEEE electrical power energy conference (EPEC), pp 1–7

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kosterev DN, Taylor CW, Mittelstadt WA (1999) Model validation for the august 10, 1996 WSCC system outage. IEEE Trans Power Syst 14(3):967–979

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Andersson G, Donalek P, Farmer R, Hatziargyriou N, Kamwa I, Kundur P, Martins N, Paserba J, Pourbeik P, Sanchez-Gasca J, Schulz R, Stankovic A, Taylor C, Vittal V (2005) Causes of the 2003 major grid blackouts in North America and Europe, and recommended means to improve system dynamic performance. IEEE Trans Power Syst 20(4):1922–1928

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kaplan SM, Sissine F, Abel A, Wellinghoff J, Kelly SG, Hoecker JJ (2009) Smart grid: modernizing electric power transmission and distribution; energy independence, storage and security; energy independence and security act of 2007 (EISA); improving electrical grid efficiency, communication, reliability, and resiliency; integrating new and renewable energy sources. Government series, TheCapitol.Net

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chen G, Dong ZY, Hill DJ, Zhang GH (2009) An improved model for structural vulnerability analysis of power networks. Physica A 388(19):4259–4266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Freeman LC (1979) Centrality in social networks: I. conceptual clarification. Social Networks 1:215–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Watts DJ, Strogatz SH (1998) Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature 393(6684):440–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Reka A, Barabási AL (2002) Statistical mechanics of complex networks. Rev Mod Phys 74:47–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hines P, Cotilla-Sanchez E, Blumsack S (2010) Do topological models provide good information about electricity infrastructure vulnerability? Chaos Interdisc J Nonlinear Sci 20(3):033122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dwivedi A, Yu X (2011) A maximum flow based complex network approach for power system vulnerability analysis. IEEE Trans Industr Inf 99:1

    Google Scholar 

  13. Chen G, Dong ZY, Hill DJ, Xue YS (2011) Exploring reliable strategies for defending power systems against targeted attacks. IEEE Trans Power Syst 26(3):1000–1009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sun k (2005) Complex networks theory: a new method of research in power grid. In: 2005 IEEE/PES transmission and distribution conference and exhibition: Asia and Pacific, pp 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  15. Chen X, Sun K, Cao Y, Wang S (2007) Identification of vulnerable lines in power grid based on complex network theory. In: 2007 IEEE power engineering society general meeting, pp 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zhao H, Zhang C, Ren H (2008) Power transmission network vulnerable region identifying based on complex network theory. In: Third international conference on electric utility deregulation and restructuring and power technologies, 2008. DRPT, pp 1082–1085

    Google Scholar 

  17. Dwivedi A, Yu X, Sokolowski P (2009) Identifying vulnerable lines in a power network using complex network theory. In: IEEE international symposiumon industrial electronics, 2009. ISIE, pp 18–23

    Google Scholar 

  18. Xu S, Zhou H, Li C, Yang X (2009) Vulnerability assessment of power grid based on complex network theory. In: Asia-Pacific power and energy engineering conference, 2009. APPEEC, pp 1–4

    Google Scholar 

  19. Dwivedi A, Yu X, Sokolowski P (2010) Analyzing power network vulnerability with maximum flow based centrality approach. In: 2010 8th IEEE international conference on industrial informatics (INDIN), pp 336–341

    Google Scholar 

  20. Chen G, Dong ZY, Hill DJ, Zhang GH, Hua KQ (2010) Attack structural vulnerability of power grids: a hybrid approach based on complex networks. Physica A 389(3):595–603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wang Z, Scaglione A, Thomas RJ (2010) Electrical centrality measures for electric power grid vulnerability analysis. In: 2010 49th IEEE conference on decision and control (CDC), pp 5792–5797

    Google Scholar 

  22. Bompard E, Napoli R, Xue F (2010) Extended topological approach for the assessment of structural vulnerability in transmission networks. IET Gener Transm Distrib 4(6):716–724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Bompard E, Di W, Xue F (2011) Structural vulnerability of power systems: a topological approach. Electr Power Syst Res 81(7):1334–1340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Saadat H (2002) Power systems analysis. McGraw-Hill series in electrical and computer engineering, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill Custom Publishing, 712 p, July 15 2002, ISBN-10:0072848693, ISBN-13:978-0072848694

    Google Scholar 

  25. IEEE power system test case archieve (2013) http://www.ee.washington.edu/research/pstca. Accessed 11 Nov 2013

  26. Nasiruzzaman ABM, Pota HR (2013) Bus dependency matrix of electrical power systems. Int J Electr Power Energ Syst (Article in Press), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2013.10.031

  27. Freeman LC (1980) The gatekeeper, pair-dependency and structural centrality. Qual Quant 14(4):585–592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Johnson DB (1977) Efficient algorithms for shortest paths in sparse networks. J ACM 24:1–13

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Albert R, Jeong H, Barabasi AL (2000) Error and attack tolerance of complex networks. Nature 406(6794):378–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Albert R, Albert I, Nakarado GL (2004) Structural vulnerability of the North American power grid. Phys Rev E 69:025103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Carreras BA, Newman DE, Dobson I, Poole AB (2004) Evidence for self-organized criticality in a time series of electric power system blackouts. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst I (Reg Papers) 51(9):1733–1740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Dobson I, Carreras BA, Lynch VE, Newman DE (2007) Complex systems analysis of series of blackouts: cascading failure, critical points, and self-organization. Chaos 17(2):026103

    Google Scholar 

  33. Mei S, He F, Zhang X, Wu S, Wang G (2009) An improved OPA model and blackout risk assessment. IEEE Trans Power Syst 24(2):814–823

    Google Scholar 

  34. Wood AJ, Wollenberg BF (2006) Power generation operation and control, Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. B. M. Nasiruzzaman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nasiruzzaman, A.B.M., Akter, M.N., Pota, H.R. (2014). Impediments and Model for Network Centrality Analysis of a Renewable Integrated Electricity Grid. In: Hossain, J., Mahmud, A. (eds) Renewable Energy Integration. Green Energy and Technology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4585-27-9_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4585-27-9_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-4585-26-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-4585-27-9

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics