Abstract
This chapter examines the close relationship between what constitutes authorship and originality as these concepts are used as a foundation for views of plagiarism. It is important to revisit our beliefs about what makes up authorial rights because digital technologies contest the very core of what it means to have authorship rights over text. Authorship and originality also underpin the birth, and continued life, of plagiarism in policy and practice. Drawing on the nexus between legal and literary theories of authorship across four global spheres — England, Europe, the United States, and the UN — this chapter examines how plagiarism has come to be realized both in terms of authorial rights and how this has framed plagiarism as represented in university plagiarism policies. The tension between the Romantic notion of authorship (which has evolved through legal theory and the Law) and literary intertextuality, which challenges the idea of “owning words”, is evident in the debate over plagiarism being framed as academic misconduct or academic integrity. This chapter outlines that debate.
Keywords
- Literary Work
- Academic Integrity
- World Intellectual Property Organization
- Berne Convention
- Academic Misconduct
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Substantially all ideas are second-hand, consciously and unconsciously drawn from a million outside sources, and daily used by the garnerer with a pride and satisfaction born of the superstition that he originated them.
(Mark Twain 1917, pp. 731–2)
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abasi, A., & Graves, B. (2008). Academic literacy and plagiarism: Conversations with international graduate students and disciplinary professors. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7, 221–233.
Bakhtin, M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays (trans: McGee, V.W.). Austin: University of Texas Press.
Barthes, R. (1977). The death of the author. Glasgow: Fontana Press.
Bloch, J. (2012). Plagiarism, intellectual property and the teaching of L2 writing. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Bobis, J., Shore, S., Bennett, D., Bennett, S., Chan, P., Harrison, N., & Seddon, T. (2013). Education research in Australia: Where is it conducted? Australian Educational Researcher, 40(4), 453–471.
De Voss, D., & Rosati, A. (2002). “It wasn’t me, was it?” Plagiarism and the web. Computers and Composition, 19(2), 191–203.
Eret, E., & Gokmenoglu, T. (2010). Plagiarism in higher education: A case study with prospective academicians. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 3303–3307.
Feather, J. (1994). From rights in copies to copyright: The recognition of authors’ rights in English law and practice in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. Durham: Duke University Press.
Ficsor, M. (2002). The law of copyright and the internet: The 1996 WIPO treaties, their interpretation and implementation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Foucault, M. (1972). The discourse on language. In M. Foucault (Ed.), Archaeology of knowledge (pp. 215–236). New York: Pantheon Books.
Françon, A. (1999). Protection of artists’ moral rights on the internet. In F. Pollaud-Dulian (Ed.), Perspectives on intellectual property: The internet and authors’ rights (pp. 73–86). London: University of London.
Frow, J. (2000). Public domain and the new world order in knowledge. Social Semiotics, 10(2), 173–185.
Galloway, K., & Jones, P. (2012). Scholarship in the discipline and higher education: The need for a fusion epistemology focused on academic identity. Higher Education Research and Development, 31(6), 931–933.
Gendreau, Y. (1999). Intention and copyright law. In F. Pollaud-Dulian (Ed.), Perspectives on intellectual property: The internet and authors’ rights (pp. 1–24). London: University of London.
Glendinning, I. (2014). Responses to student plagiarism across higher education institutions across Europe. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 10(1), 4–20.
Gullifer, J., & Tyson, G. (2010). Exploring university students’ perceptions of plagiarism: A focus group study. Studies in Higher Education, 35, 463–481.
Hartle, R. T., Kimmins, L., & Huijser, H. (2009). Criminal intent or cognitive dissonance: How does self-plagiarism fit into academic integrity? In Conference proceedings, 4th Asia Pacific Conference on Educational Integrity, Wollongong. http://ro.uow.edu.au/apcei/09/papers/5/
Howard, R. M. (1995). Plagiarisms, authorships and the academic death penalty. College English, 57(7), 788–806.
Howard, R. M. (1999). Standing in the shadow of giants: Plagiarists, authors, collaborators. Stamford: Ablex.
Howard, R. M. (2007). Understanding “internet plagiarism”. Computers and Composition, 24, 3–15.
Howard, R. M. (2008). Plagiarizing (from) graduate Students. In R. M. Howard & A. E. Robillard (Eds.), Pluralizing plagiarism: Identities, contexts, pedagogies (pp. 92–100). Portsmouth: Boynton/Cook.
Jones, D. (2011). Academic dishonesty: Are more students cheating? Business Communication Quarterly, 74(2), 141–150.
Lehman, C. M., & DuFrene, D. (2011). Business communication (16th ed.). Mason: South-Western/Cengage Learning.
MacDonald, R., & Carroll, J. (2006). Plagiarism – A complex issue requiring a holistic institutional approach. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(3), 233–245.
MacSherry, C. (2000). Who owns academic work? Battling for control of intellectual property. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Mallon, T. (1989). Stolen words. San Diego: Harcourt.
Marsh, B. (2007). Plagiarism: Alchemy and remedy in higher education. Albany: State University of New York Press.
McCabe, D. (2003). Promoting academic integrity – A US/Canadian perspective. Paper presented at the educational integrity: Plagiarism and other perplexities conference (21–22 Nov). In H. Marsden, M. Hicks, & A. Bundy (Eds.), Educational integrity: Plagiarism and Other Perplexities, Conference Proceedings (pp. 3–12), Adelaide.
McCabe, D., Feghali, T., & Abdallah, H. (2008). Academic dishonesty in the Middle East: Individual and contextual factors. Research in Higher Education, 49(5), 451–467.
Park, C. (2003). In other (people’s) words: Plagiarism by university students – Literature and lessons. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 28(5), 471–488.
Park, C. (2004). Rebels without a clause: Towards an institutional framework for dealing with plagiarism by students. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 28(3), 291–306.
Passa, J. (1999). The protection of copyright on the internet under French law. In F. Pollaud-Dulian (Ed.), Perspectives on intellectual property: The internet and authors’ rights (pp. 23–72). London: Sweet and Maxwell.
Pecorari, D. (2008). Academic writing and plagiarism: A linguistic analysis. London: Continuum.
Pecorari, D. (2013). Teaching to avoid plagiarism: How to promote good source use. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Phan, L. H. (2006). Plagiarism and overseas students: Stereotypes again? ELT English Language Training, 60, 76–78.
Power, G. L. (2009). University students’ perceptions of plagiarism. The Journal of Higher Education, 80(6), 643–662.
Prowle, M. (2013). University funding: Give the REF the red card. Retrieved Nov 2014 from http://opinion.publicfinance.co.uk/2013/02/university-funding-give-the-ref-the-red-card
Rose, M. (1993). Authors and owners: The invention of copyright. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Schmelkin, L. P., Pedhazur, L., Gilbert, K., Spencer, K. J., Pincus, H. S., & Silva, R. (2008). A multidimensional scaling of college students’ perceptions of academic dishonesty. The Journal of Higher Education, 79(5), 587–607.
Selwyn, N. (2008). ‘Not necessarily a bad thing…’: A study of online plagiarism among undergraduate students. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(5), 465–479.
Skaar, H., & Hammer, H. (2013). Why students plagiarise from the internet: The views and practices in three Norwegian upper secondary classrooms. International Journal of Educational Integrity, 9(2), 15–34.
Sutherland-Smith, W. (2005a). The tangled web: Plagiarism, the internet and students’ academic writing. Journal of Asia-Pacific Communication. Special Issue, 15(1), 15–31.
Sutherland-Smith, W. (2005b). Pandora’s box: Academic perceptions of student plagiarism in writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 4(1), 83–95.
Sutherland-Smith, W. (2008). Plagiarism, the internet and student learning: Improving academic integrity. London: Routledge.
Sutherland-Smith, W. (2010). Retribution, deterrence and reform: The dilemmas of plagiarism management in universities. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 32(1), 1–12.
Sutherland-Smith, W. (2013). Crossing the line: Collusion or collaboration in university group-work. Australian Universities Review, 55(1), 51–59.
Sutherland-Smith, W. (2014). Legality, quality assurance and learning: Competing discourses of plagiarism management in higher education. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 36(1), 29–42.
Taylor, J. (2001). The impact of performance indicators on the work of university academics: Evidence from Australian universities. Higher Education Quarterly, 55, 42–61.
Twain, M. (1917). Letter to Helen Keller. In S. Clemens (Ed.), Mark Twain’s letters, Vol. 2 of 2 (pp. 731–732). New York: Harper & Bros.
Walker, J. (2010). Measuring plagiarism: Researching what students do, not what they say they do. Studies in Higher Education, 35(1), 41–59.
WIPO. (2002a). Berne convention treatises. Retrieved 27 Nov 2014 from http://www.wipo.org
WIPO. (2002b). WIPO copyright treaty. Retrieved 27 Nov 2014 from http://www.wipo.int/docs/wo/wo033en
WIPO. (2002c). Berne convention treatises and the TRIPS agreement. Retrieved 27 Nov 2014 from http://www.wipo.int/docs/treatises/TRIPS
WIPO. (2003). Berne convention for the protection of literary and artistic works. Retrieved 27 Nov 2014 from http://www.wipo.int/treaties/ip/berne.index.html
Woodmansee, M. (1994). On the author effect: Recovering collectivity. In M. Woodmansee & P. Jaszi (Eds.), The construction of authorship: Textual appropriation in law and literature (pp. 19–37). Durham: Duke University Press.
Yeo, S. (2007). First year science and engineering students’ understanding of plagiarism. Higher Education Research and Development, 26(2), 199–216.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this entry
Cite this entry
Sutherland-Smith, W. (2016). Authorship, Ownership, and Plagiarism in the Digital Age. In: Bretag, T. (eds) Handbook of Academic Integrity. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-098-8_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-098-8_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-287-097-1
Online ISBN: 978-981-287-098-8
eBook Packages: EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education