Skip to main content

Potential and Challenges in Integrating Science and Mathematics in the Classroom Through Real-World Problems: A Case of Implementing an Interdisciplinary Approach to STEM

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Asia-Pacific STEM Teaching Practices

Abstract

There is a pressing need to make STEM integration more transparent and balanced across disciplines, to support teachers in fostering this integration, and to evaluate students’ learning through such integration. However, research has been inconclusive as to what effective STEM integration entails. This study employs design-based research methodology in a case study of two teachers from one secondary school that was implementing an interdisciplinary approach in STEM. The findings indicated increased student engagement and enjoyment from the use of real-world problems and apparent student autonomy and ownership of the project. The teachers thought more deeply about how to better integrate interdisciplinary skills and knowledge in their teaching, and they experienced a greater sense of satisfaction in making learning meaningful for students. The challenges that teachers face include the integration of the learning of two subject disciplines into one interdisciplinary discipline that has real-world applications and the time needed to plan collaboratively. An interdisciplinary approach requires a change in school culture as to the provision in the timetable for interdisciplinary planning and to the enculturation of inquiry-based learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bannan-Ritland, B. (2003). The role of design in research: The integrative learning design framework. Educational Reseacher, 32(1), 21–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blum, W., & Niss, M. (1991). Applied mathematical problem solving, modelling, applications and links to other subjects. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22(1), 37–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryan, L. A., Moore, T. J., Johnson, C. C., & Roehrig, G. H. (2015). Integrated STEM education. In C. C. Johnson, E. E. Peters-Burton, & T. J. Moore (Eds.), STEM road map: A framework for integrated STEM education (pp. 23–37). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • California Department of Education. (2014). Innovate: A blueprint for science, technology, engineering, and mathematics in California public education (STEM Task Force Report). Sacramento, CA: Author. Available from https://www.cde.ca.gov/pd/ca/sc/documents/innovate.pdf.

  • Clarke, D., & Hollingsworth, H. (2002). Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 947–967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corlu, M. S., Capraro, R. M., & Capraro, M. M. (2014). Introducing STEM education: Implications for educating our teachers for the age of innovation. Education and Science, 39(171), 74–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Design-Based Research Collective. (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 5–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dreher, A., Kuntze, S., & Lerman, S. (2016). Why use multiple representations in the mathematics classroom? Views of English and German preservice teachers. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14(2), 363–381. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-015-9633-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • English, L. D. (2009). Promoting interdisciplinarity through mathematical modelling. ZDM Mathematics Education, 41, 161–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • English, L. D. (2016). STEM education K-12: Perspectives on integration. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0036-1.

  • English, L. D. (2017). Advancing elementary and middle school STEM education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(Suppl. 1), S5–S24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • English, L. D., & King, D. T. (2015). STEM learning through engineering design: Fourth-grade students’ investigations in aerospace. International Journal of STEM Education, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-015-0027-7.

  • Ferri, R. B., & Mousoulides, N. (2017). Mathematical modelling as a prototype for interdisciplinary mathematics education? Theoretical reflections. Paper presented at the CERME 10, Dublin, Ireland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Funner, J. M., & Kumar, D. D. (2007). The mathematics and science integration argument: A strand for teacher education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 3(3), 185–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, M., & Tillotson, J. W. (2018). Interpreting integrated STEM: Sustaining pedagogical innovation within a public middle school context. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-018-9927-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs, L. (2012). Teaching out-of-field: Factors shaping identities of secondary science and mathematics. Teach Science, 58(1), 21–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs, L., Cripps Clark, J., & Plant, B. (2018). Successful students—STEM program: Teacher learning through a multifaceted vision for STEM education. In R. Jorgensen & K. Larkin (Eds.), STEM education in junior secondary (pp. 133–168). Singapore: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Honey, M., Pearson, G., & Schweingruber, H. (Eds.). (2014). STEM integration in K-12 education: Status, prospects and an agenda for research. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, C. C., & Sondergeld, T. A. (2015). Effective STEM professional development. In C. C. Johnson, E. E. Peters-Burton, & T. J. Moore (Eds.), STEM road map: A framework for integrated STEM education (pp. 203–210). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Johri, A., Roth, W.-M., & Olds, B. (2013). The role of representations in engineering practices: Taking a turn towards inscriptions. Journal of Engineering Education, 102(1), 2–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1999). Pandora’s hope. Essays on the reality of science studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2000). Developing model-based reasoning in mathematics and science. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 21(1), 39–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehrer, R., Schauble, L., & Lucas, D. (2008). Supporting development of the epistemology of inquiry. Cognitive Development, 23(4), 512–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leung, A. (2018). Exploring STEM pedagogy in the mathematics classroom: A tool-based experiment lesson on estimation. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-018-9924-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowrie, T., Downes, N., & Leonard, S. (2018). STEM education for all young Australians: A Bright Spots STEM Learning Hub Foundation Paper for SVA, in partnership with Samsung. Canberra, ACT: University of Canberra STEM Education Research Centre. Retrieved from http://www.socialventures.com.au/assets/STEM-education-for-all-young-Australians-Smaller.pdf.

  • Marginson, S., Tytler, R., Freeman, B., & Roberts, K. (2013). STEM: Country comparisons—International comparisons of science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education. Melbourne, Australia: Australian Council of Learned Academies. Retrieved from https://acola.org.au/wp/PDF/SAF02Consultants/SAF02_STEM_%20FINAL.pdf.

  • Moore, T. J., Glancy, A. W., Tank, K. M., Kersten, J. A., Smith, K. A., & Stohlmann, M. S. (2014). A framework for quality K-12 engineering education: Research and development. College of Pre-College Engineering Education, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.7771/2157-9288.1069.

  • Nadelson, L. S., & Seifert, A. L. (2017). Integrated STEM defined: Contexts, challenges, and the future. Journal of Educational Research, 110(3), 221–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, G. (2017). National academics piece on integrated STEM. Journal of Educational Research, 110(3), 224–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ríordáin, M. N., Johnston, J., & Walshe, G. (2016). Making mathematics and science integration happen: Key aspects of practice. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 47(2), 233–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, M. E. (2012). Integrative STEM education as best practice. In H. Middleton (Ed.), Explorations of best practice in technology, design, & engineering education (Vol. 2, pp. 103–117). Queensland, Australia: Griffith Institute for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoenfeld, A. (2004). Multiple learning communities: Students, teachers, instructional designers, and researchers. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 36(2), 237–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaughnessy, J. M. (2013). Mathematics in a STEM context. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 18(6), 324–327. https://doi.org/10.5951/mathteacmiddscho.18.6.0324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siekmann, G., & Korbel, P. (2016). Defining ‘STEM’ skills: Review and synthesis of the literature. Adelaide, Australia: National Centre for Vocational Education Research (NCVER). Available from https://www.ncver.edu.au/research-and-statistics/publications/all-publications/what-is-stem-the-need-for-unpacking-its-definitions-and-applications.

  • Stinson, K., Harkness, S. S., Meyer, H., & Stallworth, J. (2009). Mathematics and science integration: Models and characterizations. School Science and Mathematics, 109(3), 153–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treacy, P., & O’Donoghue, J. (2014). Authentic integration: A model for integrating mathematics and science in the classroom. International Journal of Mathematics Education in Science and Technology, 45(5), 703–718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tytler, R. (2016, July 24–31). Challenges for mathematics within an interdisciplinary STEM education. Paper (keynote) presented at the 13th International Congress on Mathematical Education. Hamburg, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • van den Akker, J., Gravemeijer, K., McKenney, S., & Nieveen, N. (2006). Educational design research. Abingdon, England: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vasquez, J. A. (2014). STEM beyond the acronym. Educational Leadership, (December), 10–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasquez, J. A., Sneider, C., & Comer, M. (2013). STEM lesson essentials, Grades 3–8: Integrating science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, H.-H., Moore, T. J., Roehrig, G. H., & Park, M. S. (2011). STEM integration: Teacher perceptions and practice. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284314636.

  • Williams, J., Roth, W.-M., Swanson, D., Doig, B., Groves, S., Omuvwie, M., et al. (2016). Interdisciplinary mathematics education: A state of the art. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the teachers and students in the school who contributed to this study and Dr. Esther Y.-K. Loong for her contribution to the project. The study was funded by Research for Educational Impact, Faculty of Arts and Education, Deakin University, Australia.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wanty Widjaja .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Widjaja, W., Hubber, P., Aranda, G. (2019). Potential and Challenges in Integrating Science and Mathematics in the Classroom Through Real-World Problems: A Case of Implementing an Interdisciplinary Approach to STEM. In: Hsu, YS., Yeh, YF. (eds) Asia-Pacific STEM Teaching Practices. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0768-7_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0768-7_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-0767-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-0768-7

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics