Abstract
The macro policy context for assessment in higher education has changed to focus on explicit standards and learning outcomes. While different countries and institutions are at different stages of the process of reorienting assessment to become more directly standards based, the implications for assessment and learning are substantial. Assessment becomes transparent in multiple ways: it is possible to report on what students can actually do, rather than how they stand vis-à-vis others (norm-referenced assessment). Outcomes can be compared across courses, institutions and countries. Students can progressively track their achievement of outcomes when these are explicit. Assessment becomes open to scrutiny as never before as standards-based assessment requires a scaling up of transparency. This chapter explores the new context of assessment and what opportunities it affords. It considers the implications for assessment practice and identifies ways in which the new framework directly conflicts with familiar taken-for-granted assessment practices, such as conventional grading. It concludes by pointing to new opportunities offered and what needs to be done to realize them.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Australian Learning and Teaching Council (ALTC). (2011). Learning and teaching academic standards project final report. Sydney, Australia: Australian Learning and Teaching Council.
Baik, C., & James, R. (2014). Seven strategic areas for advancing the assessment of learning in higher education. In H. Coates (Ed.), Higher education learning outcomes assessment: International perspectives. Frankfurt, Germany: Peter Lang.
Biggs, J. (1996). Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. Higher Education, 32, 347–364.
Boud, D., Lawson, R., & Thompson, D. (2013). Does student engagement in self-assessment calibrate their judgment over time? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(8), 941–956.
Boud, D., & Molloy, E. (2013). Rethinking models of feedback for learning: The challenge of design. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(6), 698–712.
Boud, D., & Soler, R. (2016). Sustainable assessment revisited. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(3), 400–413.
Clarke, J., & Boud, D. (submitted for publication). Refocusing portfolio assessment: Curating for feedback and portrayal.
Deneen, C., & Boud, D. (2014). Patterns of resistance in managing assessment change. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(5), 577–591.
Hartog, P., & Rhodes, E. C. (1935). An examination of examinations. London: Macmillan.
Hartog, P., & Rhodes, E. C. (1936). The marks of examiners. London: Macmillan.
Higher Education Standards Framework. (2015). Federal register of legislative instruments F2015 L01639. Canberra, Australia: Commonwealth of Australia.
Hughes, G. (2011). Towards a personal best: A case for introducing ipsative assessment in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 36(3), 353–367.
Oliver, B. (2016). 21C credentials: Curate, credential and carry forward digital learning evidence. Sydney, Australia: Office for Learning and Teaching.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2016). International assessment of higher education learning outcomes (AHELO) feasibility study. Retrieved from www.oecd.org/edu/ahelo
Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (QAA). (2016). Quality assurance agency subject benchmark statements. Retrieved from http://www.qaa.ac.uk/assuring-standards-and-quality/the-quality-code/subject-benchmark-statements
Sadler, D. R. (2009). Grade integrity and the representation of academic achievement. Studies in Higher Education, 34(7), 807–826.
Sadler, D. R. (2015). Three in-course assessment reforms to improve higher education learning outcomes. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. doi:10.1080/02602938.2015.1064858.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Boud, D. (2017). Standards-Based Assessment for an Era of Increasing Transparency. In: Carless, D., Bridges, S., Chan, C., Glofcheski, R. (eds) Scaling up Assessment for Learning in Higher Education. The Enabling Power of Assessment, vol 5. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3045-1_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3045-1_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-3043-7
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-3045-1
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)