Abstract
If somebody asked us to address the merits of Alan Schoenfeld and Günter Törner for mathematics education in a single sentence we would probably argue that they are mathematicians and mathematics educators who are able to think mathematically in both contexts and to share their way of thinking with both communities.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bullock, M., & Ziegler, A. (1999). Scientific thinking: Development and individual differences. In F. E. Weinert & W. Schneider (Eds.), Individual development from 3 to 12 (pp. 38–54). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Bullock, M., Sodian, B., & Koerber, S. (2009). Doing experiments and understanding science: Development of scientific reasoning from childhood to adulthood. In W. Schneider & M. Bullock (Eds.), Human development from early childhood to early adulthood. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Common Core State Standards Initiative (CCSSI) (2010). Common Core State Standards for Mathematics. Retrieved 2011/11/15 from http://www.corestandards.org/assets/CCSSI_Math%20Standards.pdf.
Duncker, K. (1935). Zur Psychologie des produktiven Denkens. Berlin: Springer.
Fischbein, E. (1987). Intuition in science and mathematics. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Fischbein, E., & Schnarch, D. (1997). The evolution with age of probabilistic intuitively based misconceptions. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28, 96–105.
Green, D. R. (1982). Probability concepts in 11–16 year old pupils. University of Technology, Loughborough, England Report of Research, CAMET.
Inhelder, B., & Piaget, J. (1958). The growth of logical thinking from childhood to adolescence.New York, NY: Basic Books.
Koerber, S., Sodian, B., Kropf, N., Mayer, D., & Schwippert, K. (2011). Die Entwicklung des wissenschaftlichen Denkens im Grundschulalter. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie, 43(1), 16–21.
Koerber, S., Sodian, B., Thoermer, C., & Nett, U. (2005). Scientific reasoning in young children. Preschoolers’ ability to evaluate covariation evidence. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 64, 141–152.
Kuhn, D. (2011). What is scientific thinking and how does it develop? In U. Goswami (Ed.), The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of childhood cognitive development. West Sussex: BlackWell Publishers.
Kuhn, D., & Pearsall, S. (2000). Developmental origins of scientific thinking. Journal of Cognition and Development, 1, 113–129.
Kultusministerkonferenz (KMK). (2004). Bildungsstandards im Fach Mathematik für den Primarbereich. Beschluss der Kultusministerkonferenz vom 15.10.2004. München: Luchterhand.
Lindmeier, A., Reiss, K., Ufer, S., Barchfeld, P., & Sodian, B. (2011). Umgang mit wissenschaftlicher Evidenz in den Jahrgangsstufen 2, 4 und 6: Stochastische Basiskonzepte und Kontingenztafelanalyse. In R. Haug & L. Holzäpfel (Eds.), Beiträge zum Mathematikunterricht 2011. Münster: WTM.
McKenzie, C. R. M. (1994). The accuracy of intuitive judgment strategies: Covariation assessment and bayesian inference. Cognitive Psychology, 26(3), 209–239.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.
Reiss, K., & Winkelmann, H. (2008). Kompetenzstufenmodelle für das Fach Mathematik im Primarbereich. In D. Granzer, O. Köller, A. Bremerich-Vos, K. Reiss, & G. Walther (Eds.), Bildungsstandards Deutsch und Mathematik. Leistungsmessung in der Grundschule (pp. 120–141). Weinheim: Beltz.
Reiss, K., Barchfeld, P., Lindmeier, A.M., Sodian, B., & Ufer, S. (2011). Interpreting scientific evidence: Primary student’s understanding of base rates and contingency tables. In B. Ubuz (Ed.), Proceedings of the 35th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 33-40). Ankara (Turkey): PME.
Reiss, K., Hellmich, F., & Thomas, J. (2002). Individuelle und schulische Bedingungsfaktoren für Argumentationen und Beweise im Mathematikunterricht. In M. Prenzel & J. Doll. (Eds.), Bildungsqualität von Schule: Schulische und außerschulische Bedingungen mathematischer, naturwissenschaftlicher und überfachlicher Kompetenzen. 45. Beiheft der Zeitschrift für Pädagogik (pp. 51–64). Weinheim: Beltz.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985). Mathematical problem solving. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense-making in mathematics. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook for research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 334-370). New York, NY: MacMillan.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1999). Looking toward the 21st century: Challenges of educational theory and practice. Educational Researcher, 28(7), 4–14.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (2011). How we think. A theory of goal-oriented decision making and its educational applications. New York: Routledge.
Shtulman, A., & Carey, S. (2007). Improbable or impossible? How children reason about the possibility of extraordinary events. Child Development, 78, 1015–1032.
Sodian, B., & Bullock, M. (2008). Scientific reasoning – Where are we now? Cognitive Development, 23(4), 431–434.
Sodian, B., Zaitchik, D., & Carey, S. (1991). Young cildren’s differentiation of hypothetical beliefs from evidence. Child Development, 62, 753–766.
Törner, G. (2004). Mathematische Weltbilder und ihr Einfluss auf Bildung. Wissenschaftler und Verantwortung – Mitteilungen der Gesellschaft für Verantwortung in der Wissenschaft (GVW), 12(3), 15–29.
Törner, G. (2009). Mathematical problem solving around the world: Patterns and trends. Paper presented at the EARLI conference, August 2009, Amsterdam (the Netherlands).
Törner, G., & Zielinski, U. (1992). Problemlösen als integraler Bestandteil des Mathematikunterrichts – Einblicke und Konsequenzen. Journal für Mathematikdidaktik, 13, 253–270.
Törner, G., Schoenfeld, A. H., & Reiss, K. (2007). Problem solving around the world: Summing up the state of the art. ZDM – The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 39, 353.
Zimmerman, C. (2007). The development of scientific thinking skills in elementary and middle school. Developmental Review, 27, 172–223.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Sense Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Reiss, K., Lindmeier, A.M., Barchfeld, P., Sodian, B. (2013). Developing Problem Solving Skills in Elementary School. In: Li, Y., Moschkovich, J.N. (eds) Proficiency and Beliefs in Learning and Teaching Mathematics. Mathematics Teaching and Learning. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-299-0_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-299-0_4
Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam
Online ISBN: 978-94-6209-299-0
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)