Abstract
The question of wilderness and technology has been widely debated in the human dimensions of natural resources, with scholars showing the impacts of technology upon the wilderness experience. However, these works have not fully addressed the impact of geographic information system technology on wild space. Our chapter addresses the impact of GIS on wild space with special attention to how wild space is misunderstood as mere resource to be discretely ordered and regulated. Specifically, this chapter looks at both the existential thinking of Martin Heidegger and more contemporary social-ecological work. We show how geospatial technology surreptitiously divides information about wild space from being in wild space. We discuss the phenomena of Google Trekker and remote viewing, and juxtapose them against being in wild space. We dismiss the misconception that geospatial representation does justice to the focal space held by wilderness. We argue that specific danger lies in any blind assumption that geospatial wilderness data exhausts the truth of wild space. In conclusion, this chapter, by closely examining the systemization of wild space information, sheds new light on the potentially overlooked difference between understanding wildness and understanding geospatial wilderness attributes.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Baudrillard, J. (1994). Simulacra and simulation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Borgmann, A. (1984). Technology and the character of contemporary life: A philosophical inquiry. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Borgmann, A. (1999). Holding on to reality: The nature of information at the turn of the millennium. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Borrie, W. T. (1998). Impacts of technology on the meaning of wilderness. In A. E. Watson, G. H Aplet, & J. C. Hendee (Comps.), Personal, societal, and ecological values of wilderness: Sixth world wilderness congress proceedings on research, management, and allocations. Proceedings of the RMRS-P-4 (Vol. 2, pp. 87–88). Ogden: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station.
Borrie, W. T., Meyer, A. M., & Foster, I. M. (2012, April). Wilderness experience as sanctuary and refuge from society. In D. N. Cole, (Comp.), Wilderness visitor experiences: Progress in research and management; 2011 April 4–7; Missoula, MT. Proceedings of the RMRS-P-66 (pp. 70–76). Fort Collins: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station.
Bryant, L. R. (2011). Wilderness ontology. In C. Jeffery (Ed.), Preternatural (pp. 19–26). Brooklyn: Punctum Books.
Bugbee, H. G. (1974). Wilderness in America. Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 42(4), 614–620.
Falor, R. (2012, October 24). Trekking the Grand Canyon for Google maps. Retrieved from Google, official blog: http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2012/10/trekking-grand-canyon-for-google-maps.html
Freimund, W. A., & Borrie, W. T. (1998). Wilderness in the 21st century – Are there technical solutions to our technical problems? International Journal of Wilderness, 3(4), 21–23.
Heidegger, M. (1977a). The age of the world picture. In The question concerning technology and other essays (W. Lovitt, Trans., pp. 115–154). New York: Harper & Row.
Heidegger, M. (1977b). The question concerning technology. In The question concerning technology and other essays (W. Lovitt, Trans., pp. 3–35). New York: Harper & Row.
Heidegger, M. (2001). The origin of the work of art. In Poetry, language, thought (A. Hofstadter, Trans., pp. 17–86). New York: Harper & Row.
Henn, S. (2012, October 24). Google’s street view goes into the wild. Retrieved from National Public Radio website: http://m.npr.org/news/Technology/163499448
Hofmeister, S. (2009). Nature’s running wild: A social-ecological perspective on wilderness. Nature and Culture, 4(3), 293–315.
Malpas, J. (2007). Heidegger’s topology: Being, place, world. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Martin, S. R., & Pope, K. (2012, April). The influence of hand-held information and communication technology on visitor perceptions of risk and risk-related behavior. In D. N. Cole, (Comp.), Wilderness visitor experiences: Progress in research and management; 2011 April 4–7; Missoula MT. Proceedings of the RMRS-P-66 (pp. 119–126). Fort Collins: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station.
Pohl, S. (2006). Technology and the wilderness experience. Environmental Ethics, 28(2), 147–163.
Shultis, J. (2012, April). The impact of technology on the wilderness experience: A review of common themes and approaches in three bodies of literature. In D. N. Cole, (Comp.), Wilderness visitor experiences: Progress in research and management; 2011 April 4–7; Missoula MT. Proceedings of the RMRS-P-66 (pp. 110–118). Fort Collins: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station.
Skocz, D. (2005). Wilderness management and geospatial technology: A view from the Black Forest. Environmental Philosophy, 2(2), 53–60.
Snyder, G. (1990). The etiquette of freedom. In The practice of the wild (pp. 3–26). Berkeley: Counterpoint.
Strong, D. (1995). Crazy mountains: Learning from wilderness to weigh technology. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Douglas, M.L., Borrie, W.T. (2016). Unraveling the Coil of the Wild: Geospatial Technology and Wilderness. In: Carver, S., Fritz, S. (eds) Mapping Wilderness. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-7399-7_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-7399-7_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-017-7397-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-7399-7
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)