Abstract
Graphical depictions of complex interactions pose a challenge to spatial reasoning. In this research, we tested whether analogical processes can be harnessed to help students learn to solve complex graphical reasoning problems. Specifically, we asked whether a brief training experience using spatial analogies could help students learn about stock-and-flow graphs. The basic idea of our intervention was to juxtapose contrastive graphs and encourage students to compare them. In two studies, we test the following predictions derived from structural alignment theories of analogy: (1) comparing contrastive graphs during training will lead to better performance in a graph-understanding task than will studying the same exemplars sequentially; and (2) comparing high-similarity pairs will lead to better performance than will comparing low similarity pairs. The results support both of these predictions, indicating that even a brief analogical comparison task can confer relational insight. Further, these results corroborate prior evidence that a structural alignment process underlies analogical comparison.
Keywords
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Gentner, D.: The development of relational category knowledge. In: Gershkoff-Stowe, L., Rakison, D.H. (eds.) Building Object Categories in Developmental Time, pp. 245–275. Erlbaum, Hillsdale (2005)
Namy, L.L., Gentner, D.: Making a silk purse out of two sow’s ears: Young children’s use of comparison in category learning. J. Experimental Psychology: General 131(1), 5–15 (2002)
Star, J.R., Rittle-Johnson, B.: It pays to compare: An experimental study on computational estimation. J. Experimental Child Psychology 101, 408–426 (2009)
Gentner, D., Loewenstein, J., Thompson, L.: Learning and transfer: A general role for analogical encoding. J. of Educational Psychology 95(2), 393–405 (2003)
Loewenstein, J., Gentner, D.: Spatial mapping in preschoolers: Close comparisons facilitate far mappings. J. of Cognition and Development 2(2), 189–219 (2001)
Gentner, D.: Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science 7(2), 155–170 (1983)
Gentner, D., Markman, A.B.: Structure mapping in analogy and similarity. American Psychologist 52, 45–56 (1997)
Gick, M.L., Holyoak, K.J.: Schema induction and analogical transfer. Cognitive Psychology 15(1), 1–38 (1983)
Gentner, D.: Why we’re so smart. In: Gentner, D., Goldin-Meadow, S. (eds.) Language in Mind: Advances in the Study of Language and Thought, pp. 195–235. MIT Press, Cambridge (2003)
Gentner, D.: Bootstrapping children’s learning: Analogical processes and symbol systems. Cognitive Science 34(5), 752–775 (2010)
Christie, S., Gentner, D.: Where hypotheses come from: Learning new relations by structural alignment. J. Cognition and Development 11(3), 356–373 (2010)
Gentner, D., Medina, J.: Similarity and the development of rules. Cognition 65, 263–297 (1998)
Markman, A.B., Gentner, D.: Structural alignment during similarity comparisons. Cognitive Psychology 25, 431–467 (1993)
Gentner, D., Gunn, V.: Structural alignment facilitates the noticing of differences. Memory and Cognition 29(4), 565–577 (2001)
Gentner, D., Markman, A.B.: Structural alignment in comparison: No difference without similarity. Psychological Science 5(3), 152–158 (1994)
Markman, A.B., Gentner, D.: Splitting the differences: A structural alignment view of similarity. J. Memory and Language 32, 517–535 (1993)
Gentner, D., Sagi, E.: Does “different” imply a difference? A comparison of two tasks. In: Sun, R., Miyake, N. (eds.) Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 261–266. Erlbaum, Mahwah (2006)
Carpenter, P., Shah, P.: A model of the perceptual and conceptual processes in graph comprehension. J. Experimental Psychology: Applied 4, 75–100 (1998)
Tversky, B.: Spatial schemas in depictions. In: Gattis, M. (ed.) Spatial Schemas and Abstract Thought, pp. 79–111. MIT Press, Cambridge (2001)
Pinker, S.: A theory of graph comprehension. In: Freedle, R. (ed.) Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Testing, pp. 73–126. Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1990)
Gattis, M.: Mapping relational structure in spatial reasoning. Cognitive Science 28(4), 589–610 (2004)
Bell, A., Janvier, C.: The interpretation of graphs representing situations. For the Learning of Mathematics 2(1), 34–42 (1981)
Booth Sweeney, L., Sterman, J.D.: Bathtub Dynamics: Initial Results of a Systems Thinking Inventory. System Dynamics Review 16, 249–294 (2001)
Culbertson, H.M., Powers, R.D.: A study of graph comprehension difficulties. AV Communication Review 7, 97–110 (1959)
Gattis, M., Holyoak, K.J.: Mapping conceptual to spatial relations in visual reasoning. J. Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 22, 231–239 (1996)
Kozhevnikov, M., Hegarty, M., Mayer, R.E.: Revising the visualizer/verbalizer dimension: Evidence for two types of visualizers. Cognition and Instruction 20, 47–77 (2002)
Maichle, U.: Cognitive processes in understanding line graphs. In: Schnotz, W., Kulhavy, R.W. (eds.) Comprehension of Graphics, pp. 207–226. Elsevier Science, New York (1994)
Shah, P., Carpenter, P.A.: Conceptual limitations in comprehending line graphs. J. Experimental Psychology: General 124, 43–61 (1995)
Sterman, J.D., Booth Sweeney, L.: Cloudy Skies: Assessing Public Understanding of Global Warming. System Dynamics Review 18, 207–240 (2002)
Sterman, J.D., Booth Sweeney, L.: Understanding Public Complacency About Climate Change: Adults’ Mental Models of Climate Change Violate Conservation of Matter. Climatic Change 80, 213–238 (2007)
Cronin, M.A., Gonzalez, C., Sterman, J.D.: Why don’t well-educated adults understand accumulation? A challenge to researchers, educators, and citizens. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 108, 116–130 (2009)
Cronin, M., Gonzalez, C.: Understanding the building blocks of system dynamics. System Dynamics Review 23(1), 1–17 (2007)
Pala, Ö., Vennix, J.A.M.: Effect of system dynamics education on systems thinking inventory task performance. System Dynamics Review 21(2), 147–172 (2005)
Catrambone, R., Holyoak, K.J.: Overcoming contextual limitations on problem-solving transfer. J. Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 15(6), 1147–1156 (1989)
Gentner, D., Namy, L.: Comparison in the development of categories. Cognitive Development 14, 487–513 (1999)
Mutafchieva, M., Kokinov, B.: Does the family analogy help young children to do relational mapping? In: Proceedings of the European Conference on Cognitive Science, pp. 407–412. Erlbaum, Hillsdale (2007)
Gentner, D., Loewenstein, J., Hung, B.: Comparison facilitates children’s learning of names for parts. J. Cognition and Development 8, 285–307 (2007)
Gentner, D., Ratterman, M.J., Forbus, K.D.: The roles of similarity in transfer: Separating retrievability from inferential soundness. Cognitive Psychology 25, 524–575 (1993)
Gentner, D., Toupin, C.: Systematicity and surface similarity in the development of analogy. Cognitive Science 10, 277–300 (1986)
Paik, J.H., Mix, K.S.: Preschooler’s use of surface similarity in object comparisons: Taking context into account. J. Experimental Child Psychology 95(3), 194–214 (2006)
Richland, L.E., Morrison, R.G., Holyoak, K.J.: Children’s Development of Analogical Reasoning: Insights from Scene Analogy Problems. J. Experimental Child Psychology 94, 246–273 (2006)
Gentner, D., Kurtz, K.: Relations, objects, and the composition of analogies. Cognitive Science 30, 609–642 (2006)
Gentner, D., Levine, S., Dhillon, S., Poltermann, A.: Using structural alignment to facilitate learning of spatial concepts in an informal setting. In: Kokinov, B., Holyoak, K.J., Gentner, D. (eds.) Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Analogy. NBU Press, Sofia (2009)
Kurtz, K.J., Miao, C., Gentner, D.: Learning by analogical bootstrapping. J. Learning Sciences 10(4), 417–446 (2001)
Lakoff, G., Johnson, M.: Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1980)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Smith, L.A., Gentner, D. (2012). Using Spatial Analogy to Facilitate Graph Learning. In: Stachniss, C., Schill, K., Uttal, D. (eds) Spatial Cognition VIII. Spatial Cognition 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 7463. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32732-2_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32732-2_13
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-32731-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-32732-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)