Skip to main content

Online Group Deliberation for the Elicitation of Shared Values to Underpin Decision Making

  • Conference paper
Next Generation Information Technologies and Systems (NGITS 2009)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 5831))

  • 326 Accesses

Abstract

Values have been shown to underpin our attitudes, behaviour and motivate our decisions. Values do not exist in isolation but have meaning in relation to other values. However, values are not solely the purview of individuals as communities and organisations have core values implicit in their culture, policies and practices. Values for a group can be determined by a minority in power, derived by algorithmically merging values each group member holds, or set by deliberative consensus. The elicitation of values for the group by deliberation is likely to lead to widespread acceptance of values arrived at, however enticing individuals to engage in face to face discussion about values has been found to be very difficult. We present an online deliberative communication approach for the anonymous deliberation of values and claim that the framework has the elements required for the elicitation of shared values.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Schwartz, S.H.: Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In: Zanna, M.P. (ed.) Advances in experimental social psychology, pp. 1–65. Academic Press, San Diego (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dolan, S.L., Garcia, S.: Managing by values: Cultural redesign for strategic organizational change at the dawn of the twenty-first century (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Elworthy, S., Holder, J.: Environmental Protection: Texts and Materials. Butterworths (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Parson, E.A., Fisher-Vanden, K.: Integrated Assessment Models of Global Climate Change. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment 22, 589–628 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Patz, J.A., Gibbs, H.K., Foley, J.A., Rogers, J.V., Smith, K.R.: Climate Change and Global Health: Quantifying a Growing Ethical Crisis. Ecohealth 4, 397–405 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. United Nations: World Commission on Environment and Development. Our Common Future. Oxford University Press, New York (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kaplan, R.S., Norton, D.P.: The Tangible Power of Intangible Assets: Measuring the Strategic Readiness of Intangible Assets. In: Harvard Business Review On Point Collection, pp. 14–29. Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation, Boston (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bragdon, J.H.: Book Excerpt: Profit for life: how capitalism excels. Reflections 7, 55–62 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Barrett, R.: Building a Values-Driven Organization: A Whole System Approach to Cultural Transformation. Butterworth-Heinemann, London (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hofstede, G.: Attitudes, values and organizational culture: Disentangling the concepts. Organization Studies 19, 477–492 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Nanschild, D.: Explicating Values as the Epicentre of Public Sector Leadership for New Times: Putting the ‘V’ Factor back into the Australian Public Service Values Framework. The International Journal of Knowledge, Culture and Change Management 8, 131–140 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Afshar, F.: A Computer-Mediated Framework to Facilitate Group Consensus Based on a Shared Understanding - ConSULT. University of Ballarat, Ballarat (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Afshar, F., Yearwood, J., Stranieri, A.: Capturing Consensus Knowledge from Multiple Experts. In: Bramer, M.A., Preece, A., Coenen, F. (eds.) The Twenty-Second SGAI International Conference on Knowledge Based Systems & Applied Artificial Intelligence, pp. 253–265. Springer, London (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Afshar, F., Yearwood, J., Stranieri, A.: A Tool for Assisting Group Decision Making for Consensus Outcomes in Organizations. In: Voges, K.E., Pope, N.K.L. (eds.) Computational Intelligence for Organization Managers, Business Applications and Computational Intelligence, ch. 16. Idea Group Publishing, Hershey (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Afshar, F., Straneri, A., Yearwood, J.: Toward Computer Mediated Elicitation of a Community’s Core Values for Sustainable Decision Making. In: ACKMIDS 2008 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Schwartz, S.H., Bilsky, W.: Toward a universal psychological structure of human values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 53, 550–562 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Miller, J., Bersoff, D.M., Harwood, R.L.: Perceptions of Social Responsibilities in India and the United States: Moral Imperatives or Personal Decisions? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 58, 33–47 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hofstede, G.: Cultural Constraints in Management Theories. The Academy of Management Executive 7, 81–94 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mitroff, I.I., Linstone, H.A.: The Unbounded Mind: Breaking the Chains of Traditional Business Thinking. Oxford University Press, New York (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Collins, J.C., Porras, J.I.: Built to Last: Successful Habits of Visionary Companies. Harper Business, New York (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hall, B.: Values Shift: A Guide to Personal & Organizational Transformation. Twin Lights Publishing, Rockport (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Buchko, A.A.: The effect of leadership on values-based management. Leadership & Organization Development Journal 28, 36–50 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Nohria, N., Ghoshal, S.: Differentiated fit and shared values: Alternatives for managing headquarters-subsidiary relations. Strategic Management Journal 15, 491–502 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ouchi, W.G.: Markets, bureaucracies, and clans. Administrative Science Quarterly 25, 129–141 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Morgan, R.M., Hunt, S.D.: The Commitment- trust Theory of Relationship Marketing. Journal of Marketing 58, 20–38 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Blanchard, K.: Managing by values. Executive Excellence 14, 20 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Fischer, R., Smith, P.B.: Values and organizational justice: Performance and seniority-based allocation criteria in UK and Germany. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 35, 669–688 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Stoddard, J.E., Fern, E.F.: Buying Group Choice: The Effect of Individual Group Member’s Prior Decision Frame. Psychology & Marketing 19, 59–90 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Wong, B.: Understanding Stakeholder Values as a Means of Dealing with Stakeholder Conflicts. Software Quality Journal 13, 429–445 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Fritzsche, D.J.: Personal Values: Potential Keys to Ethical Decision Making. Journal of Business Ethics 14, 909–922 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Courtney, J.F.: Decision Making and Knowledge Management in Inquiring Organizations: A New Decision-Making Paradigm for DSS. Decision Support Systems Special Issue on Knowledge Management 31, 17–38 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Rokeach, M.: From individual to institutional values: With special reference to the values of science. In: Rokeach, M. (ed.) Understanding human values, pp. 47–70. Free Press, New York (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Rokeach, M.: The Nature of Human Values. Free Press, New York (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Basic Human Values: Theory, Methods, and Applications -An Overview, http://www.yourmorals.org/schwartz.2006.basic%20human%20values.pdf

  35. Schwartz, S.: Value priorities and behavior: Applying a theory of integrated value systems. In: Seligman, C., Olson, J.M., Zanna, M.P. (eds.) The Ontario Symposium on Personality and Social Psychology: Values, pp. 1–24. Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Ros, M., Schwartz, S.H., Surkiss, S.: Basic Individual Values, Work Values, and the Meaning of Work. Blackwell Pub., Oxford (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Schwartz, S.H., Melech, G., Lehmann, A., Burgess, S., Harris, M., Owens, V.E.: Extending the cross-cultural validity of the theory of basic human values with a different method of measurement. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 32, 519–542 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Habermas, J.: Discourse Ethics. In: Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. MIT Press, Cambridge (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Boje, D.M., Murnighan, J.K.: Group confidence pressures in iterative decisions. Management Science 28, 1187–1197 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Nemeth, C.J., Wachtler, J.: Creative problem solving as a result of majority vs. minority influence. European Journal of Social Psychology 13, 45–55 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Toulmin, S.E.: The uses of argument. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1958)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Computer Based Delphi Processes, http://eies.nJit.edu/~turoff/Papers/delphi3.html

  43. Mitroff, I., Turoff, M.: Philosophical and Methodological Foundations of Delphi. In: Linstone, H.A., Turoff, M. (eds.) The Delphi Method, Techniques and Applications, pp. 17–37. Addison-Wesley Publication Company, London (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Linstone, H.A.: The Delphi Technique. In: Fowles, J. (ed.) Handbook of Future Research, pp. 273–300. Greenwood Press, Westport (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Hwang, C.L., Lin, M.J.: Group decision making under multiple criteria: methods and applications. Springer, Berlin (1987)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  46. Arrow, K.J.: Social choice and individual values. Wiley, New York (1963)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  47. Saari, D.G.: Basic geometry of voting. Springer, Berlin (1995)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  48. Buchanan, B.: Assessing human values (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Harmes, R.: The Management Myth: Exploring the Essence of Future Organisations. Business and Professional Press, Sydney (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  50. Cameron, K.S.: Ethics, virtuousness, and constant change: How to lead with unyielding integrity. In: Tichy, N.M., McGill, A.R. (eds.) The Ethical Challenge, pp. 185–194. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco (2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Afshar, F., Stranieri, A., Yearwood, J. (2009). Online Group Deliberation for the Elicitation of Shared Values to Underpin Decision Making. In: Feldman, Y.A., Kraft, D., Kuflik, T. (eds) Next Generation Information Technologies and Systems. NGITS 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5831. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04941-5_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04941-5_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-04940-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-04941-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics