Skip to main content

Current Distribution and Lorentz Field Modelling Using Cathode Designs: A Parametric Approach

  • Chapter
Book cover Light Metals 2012

Abstract

A mathematical model of magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) effects in an aluminium cell using numerical approximation of a finite element method is presented. The model predicts the current distribution in the cell and calculates the Lorentz force from the external magnetic field in molten metal for cathode blocks with different surface inclinations.

The findings indicated that the cathode surface inclinations have significant influence on cathode current density and Lorentz field distribution in the molten metal. The results establish a trend for the current density and associated MHD force distributions with increase in cathode inclination angle, φ. It has been found that cathode with φ = 5° inclination could decrease 16 to 20% of Lorentz force in the molten metal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 319.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. T. Sele, “Instabilities of the metal surface in electrolytic alumina reduction cells,” Metallurgical Transactions B, 8(4) (1977), 613–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. N. Urata, “Magnetics and Metal Pad Instability. in Light Metals: Proceedings of Sessions,” AIME Annual Meeting (Warrendale, Pennsylvania) 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  3. A.D. Sneyd, “Stability of Fluid Layers Carrying a Normal Electric Current,” Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 156 (1985) 223–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. A.D. Sneyd, and A. Wang, “Interfacial instability due to MHD mode coupling in aluminum reduction cells,” Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 263 (1994), 343–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. D.P. Ziegler, “Stability of metal/electrolyte interface in Hall-HeÌ⎕roult cells: Effect of the steady velocity,” Metallurgical Transactions B, 24(5) (1993), 899–906.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. D. Billinghurst, et al., “Development of B32 cell technology,” TMS Light Metals, (2006), 255–257.

    Google Scholar 

  7. E.D. Tarapore, “Effect of Some Operating Variables on Flow in Aluminum Reduction Cells,” Journal of Metals, 34(2) (1982), 50–55.

    Google Scholar 

  8. K.J. Fraser, et al., “Some applications of mathematical modelling of electric current distributions in Hall Heroult cells,” TMS Light Metals, (1989), 219–226.

    Google Scholar 

  9. K. Vasshaug, et al., “Formation and dissolution of aluminium carbide in cathode blocks,” TMS Light Metals, (2009), 1111–1116.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Y. Sato, P. Patel, and P. Lavoie, “Erosion measurements of high density cathode block samples through laboratory electrolysis with rotation,” TMS Light Metals, 2010, 817–822.

    Google Scholar 

  11. A.T. Tabereaux, et al., “Erosion of cathode blocks in 180 kA prebake cells,” TMS Light Metals, (1999), 187–192.

    Google Scholar 

  12. H.A. Oye and B.J. Welch, “Cathode performance: The influence of design, operations, and operating conditions,” JOM, 50(2) (1998), 18–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. D. Lombard, et al., “Aluminum Pechiney experience with graphitized cathode blocks,” TMS Light Metals, (1998), 653–658.

    Google Scholar 

  14. S. Das, G. Brooks and Y. Morsi, “Theoretical Investigation of the Inclined Sidewall Design on Magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) Forces in an Aluminum Electrolytic Cell,” Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B, 42(1) (2011), 243–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Z. Wang, et al., “Study of surface oscillation of liquid aluminum in 168kA aluminum reduction cells with a new type of cathode design,” TMS Light Metals, (2010), 485–488.

    Google Scholar 

  16. R. Von Kaenel and J. Antille, “Modeling of energy saving by using cathode design and inserts,” TMS Light Metals, (2011), 569–574.

    Google Scholar 

  17. R. Moreau, and J.W. Evans, “Analysis of the Hydrodynamics of Aluminum Reduction Cells,” Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 131(10) (1984), 2251–2259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. M.A. Doheim, et al., “Modeling and measurements of metal pad velocity in 208 kA end to end prebaked cells,” TMS Light Metals, (2008), 419–424.

    Google Scholar 

  19. A. Moraru and A. Panaitescu. “Navier-stokes equations in presence of laplace forces in the aluminum reduction cell,” TMS Light Metals, (2006), 521–626.

    Google Scholar 

  20. D.S. Severo, et al., “Comparison of various methods for modeling the metal-bath interface,” TMS Light Metals, (2008), 413–418.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Q. Xiquan, et al., “Study of current distribution in the metal pad of aluminum reduction cells,” TMS Light Metals, (2009), 575–580.

    Google Scholar 

  22. S. Wilkening, and P. Reny, “Erosion rate testing of graphite cathode materials,” TMS Light Metals, (2004), 597–602.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 TMS (The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Das, S., Littlefair, G. (2012). Current Distribution and Lorentz Field Modelling Using Cathode Designs: A Parametric Approach. In: Suarez, C.E. (eds) Light Metals 2012. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48179-1_146

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics