Abstract
This research study was designed around the notion that learning involves the recognition and development of students’ representational resources. It describes classroom sequences in the topic of ideas about matter that focused on representations and their negotiation, and reports on the effectiveness of this perspective in guiding teaching, and in providing further insight into student learning. Classroom sequences, involving two experienced teachers (Year 8 classes) and an inexperienced teacher (Year 7 class), were videotaped using a combined focus on the teacher and groups of students. Video analysis software was used to code the variety of representations used by teachers and students, and sequences of representational negotiation. The study found several issues that impacted on the teaching of the topic that include the epistemological position of the teacher, impact on pedagogy with a representational focus, content coverage and assessment as a consequence of adopting a representational focus in introducing ideas about matter .
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
Pseudonyms are used for the teachers who participated in the study.
- 2.
Normalised gain = [post-test score – pre-test score]/[maximum score – pre-test score].
References
Australian Curriculum, Assessment & Reporting Authority (ACARA). (2014). The Australian curriculum: Science, Version 8.1 F-10 Curriculum, Retrieved from http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/science/curriculum/f-10?layout=1
Carolan, J., Prain, V., & Waldrip, B. (2008). Using representations for teaching and learning in science. Teaching Science, 54(1), 18–23.
diSessa, A. (2004). Metarepresentation: Native competence and targets for instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 22(3), 293–331.
Greeno, J., & Hall, R. (1997). Practicing Representation: Learning with and about representational forms. Phi Delta Kappan, 78(5), 361–368.
Hadenfeldt, J., Xiufeng, L., & Neumann, K. (2014). Framing students’ progression in understanding matter: A review of previous research. Studies in Science Education, 50(2), 181–208.
Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64–74.
Hubber, P., Tytler, R., & Haslam, F. (2010). Teaching and learning about force with a representational focus: Pedagogy and teacher change. Research in Science Education, 40(1), 5–28.
Hubber, P. (2010). Year 8 students’ understanding of astronomy as a representational issue: Insights from a classroom video study. In D. Raine, L. Rogers, & C. Hurkett (Eds.), Physics community and cooperation (pp. 45–64). Leicester: University of Leicester.
Kind, V. (2004). Beyond appearances: Students’ misconceptions about basic chemical ideas (2nd ed.). Royal Society of Chemistry, Taken from http://www.rsc.org/images/Misconceptions_update_tcm18-188603.pdf
Kress, G., Jewitt, C., Ogborn, J., & Tsatsarelis, C. (2001). Multimodal teaching and learning: The rhetorics of the science classroom. London: Continuum.
Lemke, J. (2004). The literacies of science. In E. W. Saul (Ed.), Crossing borders in literacy and science instruction: Perspectives in theory and practice (pp. 33–47). Newark, DE: International Reading Association/National Science Teachers Association.
Moje, E. (2007). Developing socially just subject-matter instruction: A Review of the literature on disciplinary literacy learning. Review of Research in Education, 31, 1–44.
Tytler, R., Prain, V., Hubber, P., & Waldrip, B. (Eds.). (2013). Constructing representations to learn science. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Wiser, M., & Smith, C. L. (2008). Learning and teaching about matter in Grades K-8: When should the atomic theory be introduced? In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 205–239). New York: Routlege.
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Newbury Park: CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Hubber, P. (2017). Representational Issues in Teaching Ideas About Matter. In: Greczyło, T., Dębowska, E. (eds) Key Competences in Physics Teaching and Learning. Springer Proceedings in Physics, vol 190. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44887-9_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44887-9_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-44886-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-44887-9
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)