Skip to main content

Inquiry Teaching and Learning: Forms, Approaches, and Embedded Views Within and Across Cultures

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Quality Teaching in Primary Science Education

Abstract

Inquiry is a multifaceted activity. It involves a process of exploring phenomena, asking questions, investigating, representing and reasoning to construct explanations in the search for new understanding. Through inquiry learning processes, students have better opportunities to engage with phenomena, develop inquiry skills and scientific reasoning, understand the meaning of doing and talking science, and develop positive attitudes toward science. Though scholars and practitioners all recognise the importance of inquiry learning in science education, there is a variety of definitions and forms of inquiry learning as well as different instructional approaches to support it. Based on the video-ethnographic analysis of classroom pedagogical practices in Australia, Germany and Taiwan, this Chapter analyses the forms of inquiry learning in the observed science classrooms, and the instructional approaches teachers applied to support inquiry as well as the learning modes through which students engaged with inquiry activities. The Chapter explores the impact of local cultural and curriculum contexts on the framing of inquiry processes in these classrooms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • ACARA: Australian Assessment, Curriculum and Reporting Authority. (2013). Australian curriculum: Science. Retrieved from http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/science/content-structure

  • Anderson, R. (2002). Reforming science teaching: What research says about inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(1), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. (1960). The process of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bybee, R. W., Taylor, J. A., Gardner, A., Van Scotter, P., Carlson Powell, J., Westbrook, A., & Landes, N. (2006). The BSCS 5E instructional model: Origins, effectiveness, and applications. Dubuque: Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chi, M. (2009). Active-constructive-interactive: A conceptual framework for differentiating learning activities. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1, 73–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1996). Essays. In L. Hickman (Ed.), Collected work of John Dewey, 1882–1953: The electronic edition. Charlottesville: InteLex Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duschl, R. A., & Duncan, R. G. (2009). Beyond the fringe: Building and evaluating scientific knowledge systems. In S. Tobias & T. M. Duffy (Eds.), Constructivist instruction: Success or failure? (pp. 311–332). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furtak, E. M., Seidel, T., Iverson, H., & Briggs, D. C. (2012). Experimental and quasi-experimental studies of inquiry-based science teaching: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 82(3), 300–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hackling, M., Peers, S., & Prain, V. (2007). Primary connections: Reforming science teaching in Australian primary schools. Teaching Science, 53(3), 12–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herman, P., & Gomez, L. M. (2009). Taking guided learning theory to school: Reconciling the cognitive, motivational and social contexts of instruction. In S. Tobias & T. M. Duffy (Eds.), Constructivist instruction: Success or failure? (pp. 62–81). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Interacademies Panel, IBSE Working Group. (2011). Report of the working group on international collaboration in the evaluation of Inquiry-Based Science Education (IBSE) programs. Retrieved from http://www.ianas.org/meetings_education/meeting55.html

  • Kirschner, P. A. (2009). Epistemology or pedagogy, that is the question. In S. Tobias & T. M. Duffy (Eds.), Constructivist instruction: Success or failure? (pp. 144–157). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, A. E. (1995). Science teaching and the development of thinking. Belmont: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education. (2013). Curriculum guidelines for compulsory education (Grade 1–9): The learning areas of science and technology. Retrieved from http://teach.eje.edu.tw/data/files/class_rules/nature.pdf

  • National Research Council. (2013). Next generation science standards. Retrieved from http://www.nextgenscience.org/three-dimensions

  • Osborne, J. (2006). Towards a science education for all: The role of ideas, evidence and argument. Proceedings of the ACER conference: Boosting Science Learning – What will it take? Camberwell: ACER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramseger, J. (2013). Prozessbezogene Qualitätskriterien für den naturwissenschaftlichen Unterricht – zehn Kriterien für wirksames didaktisches Handeln im Elementar- und Primarbereich. In: Stiftung Haus der kleinen Forscher (Ed.): Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zur Arbeit der Stiftung „Haus der kleinen Forscher“, Bd. 5 (pp. 147–171). Schaffhausen: SCHUBI. Online http://tinyurl.com/ramseger-qualitaetskriterien

  • Ruf, U., & Gallin, P. (2005). Dialogisches Lernen in Sprache und Mathematik. Austausch unter Ungleichen. Grundzüge einer interaktiven und fächerübergreifenden Didaktik, (vol. 1) and Spuren legen, Spuren lesen. Unterricht mit Kernideen und Reisetagebüchern (vol. 2, 3rd Rev. ed). Velber: Kallmeyer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwab, J. J. (1962). The concept of the structure of a discipline. The Educational Record, 43, 197–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wise, A. F., & O’Neill, K. (2009). Beyond more versus less: A reframing of the debate on instructional guidance. In S. Tobias & T. M. Duffy (Eds.), Constructivist instruction: Success or failure? (pp. 82–105). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hsiao-Lan Sharon Chen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chen, HL.S., Tytler, R. (2017). Inquiry Teaching and Learning: Forms, Approaches, and Embedded Views Within and Across Cultures. In: Hackling, M., Ramseger, J., Chen, HL. (eds) Quality Teaching in Primary Science Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44383-6_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44383-6_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-44381-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-44383-6

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics