Abstract
“Ethical understanding” has been included as one of seven general capabilities that teachers are charged to incorporate in their teaching across all subject areas within an inclusive Australian Curriculum. In this chapter, we explore the dilemmas and challenges this will present to teachers of mathematics. We draw on ideas from psychology and philosophy to argue that moral development is not simply an internal, automatic process, nor is it a by-product of general intellectual development. Successful moral development only occurs under particular conditions. We demonstrate how selected contexts associated with some mathematical concepts, and the social issues related to them (e.g., economics, sustainability, and equity), are value-laden and ethically problematic. If all students are to develop the capacities for moral reasoning and informed decision-making, and apply them in relevant contexts, we argue that teachers must create and actively foster learning experiences which stimulate ethical inquiry and discussion in contextualised mathematical problems.
Keywords
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
- 2.
However, it should be noted that Kohlberg seemingly overlooked some fundamental differences between his ideas and those of Dewey. In particular, Kohlberg suggested that Dewey held a stage theory of development. However, Dewey would not have agreed with either Kohlberg’s notion of universal, sequential stages of development or with the different types thinking that Kohlberg described as characterising each stage.
References
ACARA. (2011). curriculum: Mathematics v3.0. http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/Mathematics/Rationale. Accessed 24 Jan 2013.
ACARA. (May 2012a). The shape of the Australian curriculum. Version 3. http://www.acara.edu.au/verve/_resources/The_Shape_of_the_Australian_Curriculum_V3.pdf. Accessed 24 Jan 2013.
ACARA. (January 2012b). The Australian curriculum: General capabilities. http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/GeneralCapabilities/Pdf/Overview. Accessed 24 Jan 2013.
Australian Association of Mathematics Teachers (AAMT). (1998). Policy on numeracy education in schools. http://www.aamt.edu.au/Publications-and-statements/Position-statements/Numeracy-Education. Accessed 24 June 2014.
Bombardieri, M. (17 Jan 2005). Summers’ remarks on women draw fire. The Boston globe. http://www.boston.com/news/local/articles/2005/01/17/summers_remarks_on_women_draw_fire/. Accessed 22 June 2014.
Chapman, S. (2003). Exporting for the future. Trends in Australia’s trade: Figuring out the figures. Canberra: Austrade.
Commonwealth of Australia. (2009). Shape of the Australian curriculum: Mathematics. http://www.acara.edu.au/verve/_resources/Australian_Curriculum_-_Maths.pdf. Accessed 22 June 2014.
Danes, S. M. (1994). Parental perceptions of children’s financial socialisation. Financial Counselling and Planning, 5, 127–146.
de Freitas, E. (2008). Critical mathematics education: Recognizing the ethical dimension of problem solving. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 3(2) (http://www.iejme.com/).
de Lange, J. (2003). Mathematics for literacy. In B. L. Madison (Ed.), Quantitative literacy: Why numeracy matters for schools and colleges (pp. 75–89). The National Council on Education and the Disciplines. http://www.maa.org/ql/whynumeracymatters.pdf.
de Meza, D., Irlenbusch, B., & Reyniers, D. (2008). Financial capability: A behavioural economics perspective. FSA Consumer Research Report 69. http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/consumer-research/crpr69.pdf.
Dewey, J. (1930). Human nature and conduct: An introduction to social psychology. New York: The Modern Library Publishers.
Dewey, J. (2014 [1916]). Democracy and education. New York: Dover Publications.
Dowling, J. (2013). Man injured after rock thrown from freeway overpass. http://www.news.com.au/national/victoria/man-injured-after-rock-thrown-from-freeway-overpass/story-fndo4cq1-1226579313894. Accessed 22 June 2014.
Duska, R., & Whelan, M. (1977). Moral development: A guide to Piaget and Kohlberg. Dublin: Gill & McMillan.
Ernest, P. (n.d.). Values and the social responsibility of mathematics. http://people.exeter.ac.uk/PErnest/pome22/Ernest%20%20Values%20and%20the%20Social%20Responsibility%20of%20Maths.doc. Accessed 22 June 2014.
Fair Trade Association (FTA) (n.d.). All about bananas. http://www.fta.org.au/school-resources.html. Accessed 22 June 2014.
Forgasz, H. (1996). Using newspapers as a resource for challenging activities. In H. Forgasz, T. Jones, G. Leder, J. Lynch, K. Maguire, & C. Pearn (Eds.) Mathematics: Making connections (pp. 102–107). Brunswick: Mathematical Association of Victoria.
Forgasz, H. (2005). Gender and mathematics: Re-igniting the debate. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 17(1), 1–2.
Forgasz, H. (2012). Gender issues and mathematics learning: What’s new “down under”? In. L. Jacobsen (Ed.), Mathematics teacher education in the public interest: Equity and social justice (pp. 99–117). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.
Frankenstein, M. (2008). In J. F. Matos, P. Valero, & K. Yasukawa (Eds.), Proceedings of the fifth international Mathematics education and society conference (pp. 261–271). Lisbon, Portugal: Centro de Investigação em Educação, Universidade de Lisboa and the Department of Education, Learning and Philosophy, Aalborg University. http://pure.ltu.se/portal/files/2376304/Proceedings_MES5.pdf.
Gellert, U., Jablonka, E., & Keitel, C. (2001). In B. Atweh, H. Forgasz, & B. Nebres (Eds.), Sociocultural research on mathematics education. An international perspective (pp. 57–73). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Gray, R., Bebbington, J., & McPhail, K. (1994). Teaching ethics in accounting and the ethics of accounting teaching: Educating for immorality and a possible case for social and environmental accounting education. Accounting Education: An International Journal, 3(1), 51–75.
Homer, P., & Kahle, L. R. (1988). A structural equation test of the value-attitude-behavior hierarchy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(4), 638–646.
Ísaksson, A. (1979). Kohlberg’s theory of moral development and its relevance to education. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 23(2), 47–63.
Kohlberg, L. (1981). Essays on moral development, Vol. I: The philosophy of moral development. San Francisco: Harper & Row.
Kohlberg, L. (1987). Child psychology and childhood education: A cognitive developmental view. New York & London: Longman.
Levy, M., Webb, C., & Doherty, B. (2012). Sherrin child labour disgusting, Demetriou says. The Age (online). http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/sherrin-child-labour-disgusting-demetriou-says-20120926-26k7p.html. Accessed 22 June 2014.
Lewis, A., & Scott, A. (2003). A study of economic socialisation: Financial practices in the home and the preferred role of schools among parents with children under 16. Citizenship, Social and Economics Education, 5(3), 138–147.
MCEETYA. (Dec 2008). Melbourne Declaration on Educational Goals for Young Australians. http://www.curriculum.edu.au/verve/_resources/National_Declaration_on_the_Educational_Goals_for_Young_Australians.pdf.
Miranda, C. (19 Jan 2002). Boffins agree our Kylie is just perfect. Mercury on saturday (p. 9) from http://www.simerr.educ.utas.edu.au/numeracy/teaching_activities/Health.html. Accessed 20 June 2014.
Mukhopadhyay, S., & Greer, B. (2001). Modelling with purpose: Mathematics as a critical tool. In B. Atweh, H. Forgasz, & B. Nebres (Eds.), Sociocultural research on mathematics education. An international perspective (pp. 295–311). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Mukhopadhyay, S., & Greer, B. (2002). Mathematics for socio-political criticism: The issue of gun violence. In S. C. Agarkar & V. D. Lale (Eds.), Science, technology and mathematics education for human development (Proceedings of the CASTME-UNESC)-HBCSE International Conference, Goa, India, February, 2001) (Vol. 2, pp. 195–199). Mumbai: Homi Bhabha Centre for Science Education, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research.
Numeracy in the News. (n.d.). http://www.simerr.educ.utas.edu.au/numeracy/default.html. Accessed 20 June 2014.
Oxfam Education. (n.d.). Water maths: Global statistics. http://www.oxfam.org.uk/education/resources/water_for_all/water/stats/index.htm. Accessed 22 June 2014.
Oxfam. (n.d.). Water for all. http://www.oxfam.org.uk/education/resources/water_for_all/. Accessed 22 June 2014.
Schoenfeld, A. (2003). Math wars. http://www.math.cornell.edu/~henderson/courses/EdMath-F04/MathWars.pdf. Accessed 22 June 2014.
Shim, S., Xiao, J. J., Barber, B. L., & Lyons, A. C. (2009). Pathways to life success: A conceptual model of financial well-being for young adults. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 30, 708–723.
Shim, S., Barber, B. L., Card, N. A., Xiao, J. J., & Serido, J. (2010). Financial socialisation of first-year college students: The roles of parents, work and education. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39, 1457–1470.
Skovsmose, O. (n.d.). Critical mathematics education for the future. http://www.educ.fc.ul.pt/docentes/jfmatos/areas_tematicas/politica/CME_for_the_Future.pdf. Accessed 22 June 2014.
Skovsmose, O. (2008). Mathematics education in a knowledge market. In E. de Freitas & K. Nolan (Eds.), Opening the research text. Critical insights and in(ter)ventions into mathematical education (pp. 159–174). New York: Springer.
Skovsmose, O., & Valero, P. (2001). Breaking political neutrality: The critical engagement of mathematics education with democracy. In B. Atweh, H. Forgasz, & B. Nebres (Eds.), Sociocultural research on mathematics education. An international perspective (pp. 37–55). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Steen, L. A. (Ed.). (2001). Mathematics and democracy: The case for quantitative literacy. Princeton: National Council on Education and the Disciplines.
Tanner, L. N. (1997). Dewey’s laboratory school: Lessons for today. New York: Teachers College Press.
Thomas, J. (2001). Globalisation and the politics of mathematics education. In B. Atweh, H. Forgasz, & B. Nebres (Eds.), Sociocultural research on mathematics education. An international perspective (pp. 95–112). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Vincent, J., Price, B., Tynan, D., Caruso, N., Romeril, G., Stillman, G., & Brown, J. (2007). Maths worlds. year 9 VELS edition. Teacher edition. Melbourne: Macmillan.
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind & society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Vygotsky, L. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Webley, P., & Nyhus, E. K. (2006). Parents’ influence on children’s future orientation and saving. Journal of Economic Psychology, 27, 140–164.
Wright, P. (2004). Human rights in the curriculum: Mathematics. London: Amnesty International.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Forgasz, H., Bleazby, J., Sawatzki, C. (2015). Ethics and the Challenges for Inclusive Mathematics Teaching. In: Bishop, A., Tan, H., Barkatsas, T. (eds) Diversity in Mathematics Education. Mathematics Education Library. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05978-5_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05978-5_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-05977-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-05978-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)